Re: OT: Lots of requests for UDP port 27015

2000-12-29 Thread Tim Haynes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I've been seeing a lot of Protocol 17 messages destined for port 27015. > I looked on the snort page to see what it said, and it didn't have any > matches. Can anybody tell me what could be happening here? These are > comming from multiple computers every few seconds.

OT: Lots of requests for UDP port 27015

2000-12-29 Thread wsuetholz
Hello, I've been seeing a lot of Protocol 17 messages destined for port 27015. I looked on the snort page to see what it said, and it didn't have any matches. Can anybody tell me what could be happening here? These are comming from multiple computers every few seconds. They are being DENIED by

Re: OT: Lots of requests for UDP port 27015

2000-12-29 Thread Tim Haynes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I've been seeing a lot of Protocol 17 messages destined for port 27015. > I looked on the snort page to see what it said, and it didn't have any > matches. Can anybody tell me what could be happening here? These are > comming from multiple computers every few seconds

OT: Lots of requests for UDP port 27015

2000-12-29 Thread wsuetholz
Hello, I've been seeing a lot of Protocol 17 messages destined for port 27015. I looked on the snort page to see what it said, and it didn't have any matches. Can anybody tell me what could be happening here? These are comming from multiple computers every few seconds. They are being DENIED b

Re: time for some OpenBSD-style auditing?

2000-12-29 Thread Nathan Paul Simons
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:39:40AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > > Actually let me chime in at this point and say that personally I'd > > probably prefer non-developers auditing. If you adopt code as an auditor, > > you lose the objectivity to be able to junk bad code relatively > > quickly...

Re: time for some OpenBSD-style auditing?

2000-12-29 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 08:46:23PM -0700, John Galt wrote: [ all developers should audit their code ] > > > > Sounds lovely, in theory. However, judging by the number of open bugs > > in some packages, out of date packages, etc, what makes you think > > developers would take this more seriously?

Re: time for some OpenBSD-style auditing?

2000-12-29 Thread Nathan Paul Simons
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:39:40AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > > Actually let me chime in at this point and say that personally I'd > > probably prefer non-developers auditing. If you adopt code as an auditor, > > you lose the objectivity to be able to junk bad code relatively > > quickly...