On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 03:30:08PM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 11:05:32PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 05:54:55PM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
> > >
> > > That's why you run the checker from a known-good floppy or CD. The bogus
> > > kernel can't
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 03:30:08PM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 11:05:32PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 05:54:55PM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
> > >
> > > That's why you run the checker from a known-good floppy or CD. The bogus
> > > kernel can't
On Sunday, 2000-12-24 at 02:59:23 +1100, Peter Eckersley wrote:
> I threw together a detailed design proposal for a simpler system; it's
> sitting at
> http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~pde/antiparanoia/design.txt
> I've started implementing a few bits and pieces of it, but I'd
> appreciate comments and c
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 11:05:32PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 05:54:55PM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
> >
> > That's why you run the checker from a known-good floppy or CD. The bogus
> > kernel can't protect itself if it isn't running :)
>
> don't be so sure, is the BIOS
Peter Eckersley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've started implementing a few bits and pieces of it, but I'd
> appreciate comments and constructive criticism before I do too much.
The basic goal looks nice (especially the Debian-specific part), however
on the implementation side... the need to rebo
On Sunday, 2000-12-24 at 02:59:23 +1100, Peter Eckersley wrote:
> I threw together a detailed design proposal for a simpler system; it's
> sitting at
> http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~pde/antiparanoia/design.txt
> I've started implementing a few bits and pieces of it, but I'd
> appreciate comments and
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 11:05:32PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 05:54:55PM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
> >
> > That's why you run the checker from a known-good floppy or CD. The bogus
> > kernel can't protect itself if it isn't running :)
>
> don't be so sure, is the BIO
Hello again...
Thankyou to the people who offered encouragement, useful suggestions and
the opportunity to thoroughly defend my proposal :)
I investigated FreeVeracity as a possible basis for a Debian auditing
system. I'd actually seen the original announcement on slashdot, but
payed more attent
Peter Eckersley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've started implementing a few bits and pieces of it, but I'd
> appreciate comments and constructive criticism before I do too much.
The basic goal looks nice (especially the Debian-specific part), however
on the implementation side... the need to reb
Hello again...
Thankyou to the people who offered encouragement, useful suggestions and
the opportunity to thoroughly defend my proposal :)
I investigated FreeVeracity as a possible basis for a Debian auditing
system. I'd actually seen the original announcement on slashdot, but
payed more atten
> Also with the Debian Firewall/Gibrator?(sorry for the spelling) does
> it include SNMP and remote managibility.
SNMP will be included in the next version, and a web interface too. At
the moment it is fully manageable over ssh.
best greets,
Rene
> Also with the Debian Firewall/Gibrator?(sorry for the spelling) does
> it include SNMP and remote managibility.
SNMP will be included in the next version, and a web interface too. At
the moment it is fully manageable over ssh.
best greets,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 05:54:55PM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
>
> That's why you run the checker from a known-good floppy or CD. The bogus
> kernel can't protect itself if it isn't running :)
don't be so sure, is the BIOS or firmware on your computer flashable?
if so an attacker could replace t
13 matches
Mail list logo
