On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Mike Furr wrote:
> I've been using the loopback crypto stuff for a while and I'm looking
> for a secure way of doing this from my user account instead of having to
> su to call losetup.
> Does anyone have suggestions / experience with doing this?
Add an entry such as:
/home/u
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Mike Furr wrote:
> I've been using the loopback crypto stuff for a while and I'm looking
> for a secure way of doing this from my user account instead of having to
> su to call losetup.
> Does anyone have suggestions / experience with doing this?
Add an entry such as:
/home/
hi all,
I've been using the loopback crypto stuff for a while and I'm looking
for a secure way of doing this from my user account instead of having to
su to call losetup.
Does anyone have suggestions / experience with doing this?
I see that you can't just run /sbin/losetup from non-root:
$ losetu
Petr Cech wrote:
> > Is this really a good idea? Since the exim install does a fair bit of
>
> what is a not a good idea? Leaving it as it always was?
Leaving tcpwrapper support out...
As for default config, probably just "exim: ALL: severity mail.info:
allow" or
some such. There seem to be far
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:11:45PM + , Nick Phillips wrote:
> Petr Cech wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is
> > > triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow
> > > and hosts.deny i
Petr Cech wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is
> > triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow
> > and hosts.deny is All: All or All: All EXCEPT
> > LOCAL.
>
> do you run exim via tcpd? Exim its
hi all,
I've been using the loopback crypto stuff for a while and I'm looking
for a secure way of doing this from my user account instead of having to
su to call losetup.
Does anyone have suggestions / experience with doing this?
I see that you can't just run /sbin/losetup from non-root:
$ loset
Petr Cech wrote:
> > Is this really a good idea? Since the exim install does a fair bit of
>
> what is a not a good idea? Leaving it as it always was?
Leaving tcpwrapper support out...
As for default config, probably just "exim: ALL: severity mail.info:
allow" or
some such. There seem to be far
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:11:45PM + , Nick Phillips wrote:
> Petr Cech wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is
> > > triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow
> > > and hosts.deny
Petr Cech wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is
> > triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow
> > and hosts.deny is All: All or All: All EXCEPT
> > LOCAL.
>
> do you run exim via tcpd? Exim it
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:54:03AM +0100, Thomas Gebhardt wrote:
> > it should segfault. good indication of a buffer overflow there.
>
> While this kind of buffer overflow is nasty, (as far as I can see)
> from a security point of view it is rather harmless.
not if the program is question is se
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:08:17PM +0300, Alan KF LAU wrote:
> My major concern is that if you enabled password authentication you'd
> leave your system vulnerable to brute force password attacked as in
> TELNET.
>
> Beside, if one could use password authentication, why would one bother
> to take
He has a website with a firewall building tool that works pretty well.
http://www.linux-firewall-tools.com/linux/firewall/index.html
Chris Gahlon
mikehaarman wrote:
> There is an excellent book on just this topic by a fellow named Robert
> L. Ziegler, published by New Riders and called Linux
>
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:54:03AM +0100, Thomas Gebhardt wrote:
> > it should segfault. good indication of a buffer overflow there.
>
> While this kind of buffer overflow is nasty, (as far as I can see)
> from a security point of view it is rather harmless.
not if the program is question is s
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:08:17PM +0300, Alan KF LAU wrote:
> My major concern is that if you enabled password authentication you'd
> leave your system vulnerable to brute force password attacked as in
> TELNET.
>
> Beside, if one could use password authentication, why would one bother
> to take
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Karsten Mueller wrote:
> > The latest version of CygWin toolkit contains OpenSSH 2.0pl1...
> > along with all the other unix tools for win32... so you can just
> > run ssh (including tunnels and other advanced features most term-emulators
> > with ssh don't have) from your bash
He has a website with a firewall building tool that works pretty well.
http://www.linux-firewall-tools.com/linux/firewall/index.html
Chris Gahlon
mikehaarman wrote:
> There is an excellent book on just this topic by a fellow named Robert
> L. Ziegler, published by New Riders and called Linux
>
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:13:40AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote:
> :( I use the slink defaults. It's triggert with
> inetd: /usr/sbin/exim exim -bs, so I thought it
> should do the job.
>
> So I have to recompile or call it via tcpd
both will work, but the tcpd approach is easier :)
> instead?
>
> -
* Alan KF LAU
| Beside, if one could use password authentication, why would one bother
| to take all the trouble setting up RSA connection? :)
Using ssh-askpass and then having passwordless connections? I am
probably not the only one on this list getting my mail by
POP-over-SSH.
--
Tollef Fo
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Karsten Mueller wrote:
> > The latest version of CygWin toolkit contains OpenSSH 2.0pl1...
> > along with all the other unix tools for win32... so you can just
> > run ssh (including tunnels and other advanced features most term-emulators
> > with ssh don't have) from your bas
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is
> triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow
> and hosts.deny is All: All or All: All EXCEPT
> LOCAL.
do you run exim via tcpd? Exim itself is not compiled with tcpwrapers s
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:13:40AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote:
> :( I use the slink defaults. It's triggert with
> inetd: /usr/sbin/exim exim -bs, so I thought it
> should do the job.
>
> So I have to recompile or call it via tcpd
both will work, but the tcpd approach is easier :)
> instead?
>
>
Hi,
I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is
triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow
and hosts.deny is All: All or All: All EXCEPT
LOCAL.
Daemonmode is off, System is Slink. Tested is with
telnet IP smtp.
- Rolf
* Alan KF LAU
| Beside, if one could use password authentication, why would one bother
| to take all the trouble setting up RSA connection? :)
Using ssh-askpass and then having passwordless connections? I am
probably not the only one on this list getting my mail by
POP-over-SSH.
--
Tollef F
Hello Mark!
> The latest version of CygWin toolkit contains OpenSSH 2.0pl1...
> along with all the other unix tools for win32... so you can just
> run ssh (including tunnels and other advanced features most term-emulators
> with ssh don't have) from your bash shell.
Nice to hear. I found nothing
Hi,
> pine is riddled with buffer overflows, its considered unfixable
> without totally throwing away 100% of the code and starting over. why
> would anyone do that when we have mutt which is a far superior and
> Free replacement.
>
> try this:
>
> (iirc)
>
> $ export HOME=3D`perl -e 'print "a
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is
> triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow
> and hosts.deny is All: All or All: All EXCEPT
> LOCAL.
do you run exim via tcpd? Exim itself is not compiled with tcpwrapers
Hi,
I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is
triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow
and hosts.deny is All: All or All: All EXCEPT
LOCAL.
Daemonmode is off, System is Slink. Tested is with
telnet IP smtp.
- Rolf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Hello Mark!
> The latest version of CygWin toolkit contains OpenSSH 2.0pl1...
> along with all the other unix tools for win32... so you can just
> run ssh (including tunnels and other advanced features most term-emulators
> with ssh don't have) from your bash shell.
Nice to hear. I found nothing
Hi,
> pine is riddled with buffer overflows, its considered unfixable
> without totally throwing away 100% of the code and starting over. why
> would anyone do that when we have mutt which is a far superior and
> Free replacement.
>
> try this:
>
> (iirc)
>
> $ export HOME=3D`perl -e 'print "
30 matches
Mail list logo
