On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 10:28:39PM -0400, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This was fixed a month or two before potato was released.
>
> I've seen those too, on up-to-date woody, so I don't think it
> really got fixed.
To clarify this, the logging of the mes
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This was fixed a month or two before potato was released.
I've seen those too, on up-to-date woody, so I don't think it
really got fixed.
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 09:09:52PM -0500, Herbert Ho wrote:
> > hi guys. i have logcheck installed so i got
This was fixed a month or two before potato was released.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 09:09:52PM -0500, Herbert Ho wrote:
> hi guys. i have logcheck installed so i got this message tonight:
>
> (sorry about the long lines, its the way it came to me)
>
> Unusual System Events
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
hi guys. i have logcheck installed so i got this message tonight:
(sorry about the long lines, its the way it came to me)
Unusual System Events
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Oct 10 19:31:37 thosolin
Oct 10 19:31:37 thosolin /sbin/rpc.statd[125]: gethostbyname error for
^X÷ÿ¿^X÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^[÷
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 10:28:39PM -0400, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This was fixed a month or two before potato was released.
>
> I've seen those too, on up-to-date woody, so I don't think it
> really got fixed.
To clarify this, the logging of the me
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This was fixed a month or two before potato was released.
I've seen those too, on up-to-date woody, so I don't think it
really got fixed.
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 09:09:52PM -0500, Herbert Ho wrote:
> > hi guys. i have logcheck installed so i got
This was fixed a month or two before potato was released.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 09:09:52PM -0500, Herbert Ho wrote:
> hi guys. i have logcheck installed so i got this message tonight:
>
> (sorry about the long lines, its the way it came to me)
>
> Unusual System Events
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
hi guys. i have logcheck installed so i got this message tonight:
(sorry about the long lines, its the way it came to me)
Unusual System Events
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Oct 10 19:31:37 thosolin
Oct 10 19:31:37 thosolin /sbin/rpc.statd[125]: gethostbyname error for
^X÷ÿ¿^X÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^[
Thomas,
Make sure you have the latest version of libdb2 as well. For that matter,
make sure you have the latest version of everything. I have ldconfig, and
it's owned by libc6, so I'm not sure how you got that...
By the way, what's this got to do with debian-security?
Regards,
Alex.
---
PGP/GP
Thomas,
Make sure you have the latest version of libdb2 as well. For that matter,
make sure you have the latest version of everything. I have ldconfig, and
it's owned by libc6, so I'm not sure how you got that...
By the way, what's this got to do with debian-security?
Regards,
Alex.
---
PGP/G
Hi,
I have upgraded glibc to 2.1.94-3. During this process I have had
the same problems as many. i.e.
* libdb.so.3 not found
* ldconfig disappears
But now my apt (dselsct and gnome-apt) shows many unsolved
dependencies which become very confusing and difficult to solve.
Most notable is the re
D.U.;
You can change the interval of the --Mark-- by adding something like this
to your /etc/init.d/sysklogd or editing the line you may have:
SYSLOGD="-m 60
This sets it for one hour (60 minutes) I think they did the 20 minute
default to show the syslog is still alive. I think hourly is OK in
Hi,
I have upgraded glibc to 2.1.94-3. During this process I have had
the same problems as many. i.e.
* libdb.so.3 not found
* ldconfig disappears
But now my apt (dselsct and gnome-apt) shows many unsolved
dependencies which become very confusing and difficult to solve.
Most notable is the r
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 09:48:49AM +0200, Rob Kaper wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 10:37:32AM +0300, Debian User wrote:
> > My /var/log/messages and /var/log/syslog files looks very strange. I
> > attached them to this mail. Can you tell me why the lines are marked like
> > this ? I have inst
D.U.;
You can change the interval of the --Mark-- by adding something like this
to your /etc/init.d/sysklogd or editing the line you may have:
SYSLOGD="-m 60
This sets it for one hour (60 minutes) I think they did the 20 minute
default to show the syslog is still alive. I think hourly is OK in
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 10:37:32AM +0300, Debian User wrote:
> My /var/log/messages and /var/log/syslog files looks very strange. I
> attached them to this mail. Can you tell me why the lines are marked like
> this ? I have installed potato.
> Oct 8 08:11:16 ady -- MARK --
This is just a lit
Don't worry about it.
-- MARK -- is there to tell you that the sytem was up and runing.
So with the marks you can see if your system has been down for example
between1am and 5am.
/Ingemar
Debian User wrote:
> My /var/log/messages and /var/log/syslog files looks very strange. I
> attached th
My /var/log/messages and /var/log/syslog files looks very strange. I
attached them to this mail. Can you tell me why the lines are marked
like this ? I have installed potato.
Adrian Nims
Oct 8 06:48:12 ady syslogd 1.3-3#33.1: restart.
Oct 8 07:11:16 ady -- MARK --
Oct 8 07:31:16 ady -- M
18 matches
Mail list logo
