Re: Logging atempts

Michel Verdier wrote: >Is there major differences between Logcheck and logsurfer ? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show logsurfer W: Unable to locate package logsurfer Logcheck is at least packaged for Debian. Frank

Re: Policy on file permissions

Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, please see the message I've attached from Chris Evans, sent to the > security-audit mailing list. The same thing can be accomplished by the setting of capabilities. This is better since you really only want to prevent compromised daemons from ptracing

Re: Logging atempts

Michel Verdier wrote: >Is there major differences between Logcheck and logsurfer ? fjc@wossname:~$ apt-cache show logsurfer W: Unable to locate package logsurfer Logcheck is at least packaged for Debian. Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Re: Policy on file permissions

Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, please see the message I've attached from Chris Evans, sent to the > security-audit mailing list. The same thing can be accomplished by the setting of capabilities. This is better since you really only want to prevent compromised daemons from ptracin

Re: Logging atempts

"Edward C. Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : | > "MV" == Michel Verdier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | MV> -- | MV> o-o | | Is there a major difference between Michel and Christoph Lameter? ??? Of course you have understood my question as : what could make logcheck better than

Re: Logging atempts

Hello. [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 04:21:28PM +, Patrick Barr wrote: > If you are looking to see if someone is getting through your ipchains and > getting stopped by tcp_wrappers, you can change your hosts.deny from > ALL: ALL to > > ALL: ALL: spawn ( \ > echo -e "\n

Re: Logging atempts

"Edward C. Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : | > "MV" == Michel Verdier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | MV> -- | MV> o-o | | Is there a major difference between Michel and Christoph Lameter? ??? Of course you have understood my question as : what could make logcheck better than

Re: Logging atempts

> "MV" == Michel Verdier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MV> -- MV> o-o Is there a major difference between Michel and Christoph Lameter? Edward. -- Edward C. Lang woot on various channels on irc.openprojects.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Normal mail. Most stuff ends up here anyway. [EMA

Re: Logging atempts

Hello. [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 04:21:28PM +, Patrick Barr wrote: > If you are looking to see if someone is getting through your ipchains and > getting stopped by tcp_wrappers, you can change your hosts.deny from > ALL: ALL to > > ALL: ALL: spawn ( \ > echo -e "\

Re: Logging atempts

Frank Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : | Description: Mails anomalies in the system logfiles to the administrator | Logcheck is part of the Abacus Project of security tools. It is a program | created to help in the processing of UNIX system logfiles generated by the | various Abacus Proje

Re: Logging atempts

> "MV" == Michel Verdier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MV> -- MV> o-o Is there a major difference between Michel and Christoph Lameter? Edward. -- Edward C. Lang woot on various channels on irc.openprojects.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Normal mail. Most stuff ends up here anyway. [EM

Re: Logging atempts

Frank Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : | Description: Mails anomalies in the system logfiles to the administrator | Logcheck is part of the Abacus Project of security tools. It is a program | created to help in the processing of UNIX system logfiles generated by the | various Abacus Proj