Re: HHHEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!

2000-07-04 Thread Mason
My address is in the list of near matches as well. Nathaniel McGowan wrote: > > Yup - i have exactly the same problem - but to add insult to injury, when i > get the response from the server that says my e-mail address has not been > recognised 10 of the 20 near matches it quotes are my exact ad

Re: using password aging with ssh

2000-07-04 Thread thomas lakofski
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > I mean, that's how it _should_ be. I know of this problem; I tried this > myself. ah, OK, it's clearer now. > A new version of OpenSSH (version 2.1.something or other I believe) is > out, which hopefully fixes this problem. Now, would someone please

Re: using password aging with ssh

2000-07-04 Thread Alexander Hvostov
Thomas, I mean, that's how it _should_ be. I know of this problem; I tried this myself. A new version of OpenSSH (version 2.1.something or other I believe) is out, which hopefully fixes this problem. Now, would someone please wake Phil Hands' as* up? :P Regards, Alex. --- PGP/GPG Fingerprint:

Re: using password aging with ssh

2000-07-04 Thread thomas lakofski
Alex, not from what I've seen -- users just get the standard 'access denied' as if they had entered the wrong password. telnet works as expected. regards, -thomas On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > Thomas, > > The old password is requested first.. ;P > > Regards, > > Alex. >

Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions]

2000-07-04 Thread Roberto Magana
Perhaps yosu should move to potato, my Athlon is been working flawlessly. On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 05:42:05PM +1000, Tim wrote: > heh, it wont even boot on my athlon let alone be stable > > tim. -- % <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ro

RE: HHHEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!

2000-07-04 Thread Nathaniel McGowan
Yup - i have exactly the same problem - but to add insult to injury, when i get the response from the server that says my e-mail address has not been recognised 10 of the 20 near matches it quotes are my exact address! I'm thinking maybe theres an autoban on offensive language - worth a try?? Noth

Re: HHHEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!

2000-07-04 Thread Mason
My address is in the list of near matches as well. Nathaniel McGowan wrote: > > Yup - i have exactly the same problem - but to add insult to injury, when i > get the response from the server that says my e-mail address has not been > recognised 10 of the 20 near matches it quotes are my exact a

Re: HHHEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!

2000-07-04 Thread Mason
I'm having the same problem. It's impossible to get removed from some of the debian mailing lists. I've even tried send emails directly to the listmaster's personal address. Didn't even get a reply. I explained that I had tried many times over the course of a few months to get myself removed withou

Re: using password aging with ssh

2000-07-04 Thread thomas lakofski
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > I mean, that's how it _should_ be. I know of this problem; I tried this > myself. ah, OK, it's clearer now. > A new version of OpenSSH (version 2.1.something or other I believe) is > out, which hopefully fixes this problem. Now, would someone pleas

Re: using password aging with ssh

2000-07-04 Thread Alexander Hvostov
Thomas, I mean, that's how it _should_ be. I know of this problem; I tried this myself. A new version of OpenSSH (version 2.1.something or other I believe) is out, which hopefully fixes this problem. Now, would someone please wake Phil Hands' as* up? :P Regards, Alex. --- PGP/GPG Fingerprint:

Re: using password aging with ssh

2000-07-04 Thread thomas lakofski
Alex, not from what I've seen -- users just get the standard 'access denied' as if they had entered the wrong password. telnet works as expected. regards, -thomas On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > Thomas, > > The old password is requested first.. ;P > > Regards, > > Alex. >

Re: using password aging with ssh

2000-07-04 Thread Ron Rademaker
Gotten this from the release critical bugreport (last one): Package: ssh (non-US/main) Maintainer: Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [HELP] Need fix. (RB) 51747 ssh: can't handle expired passwords 64424 ssh: ssh believes that xauth lives in /usr/openwin/bin [STRATEGY] Needs to be recompile

RE: HHHEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!

2000-07-04 Thread Nathaniel McGowan
Yup - i have exactly the same problem - but to add insult to injury, when i get the response from the server that says my e-mail address has not been recognised 10 of the 20 near matches it quotes are my exact address! I'm thinking maybe theres an autoban on offensive language - worth a try?? Not

Re: HHHEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!

2000-07-04 Thread Mason
I'm having the same problem. It's impossible to get removed from some of the debian mailing lists. I've even tried send emails directly to the listmaster's personal address. Didn't even get a reply. I explained that I had tried many times over the course of a few months to get myself removed witho

Re: HHHEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!

2000-07-04 Thread Luca Filipozzi
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 11:52:25AM -0700, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > Dennis, > > We don't want you to leave debian-security. ;) Welcome to the Hotel California... :) -- Luca Filipozzi [dpkg] We are the apt. Resistance is futile. You will be packaged.

Re: HHHEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!

2000-07-04 Thread Alexander Hvostov
Dennis, We don't want you to leave debian-security. ;) Regards, Alex. --- PGP/GPG Fingerprint: EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS/CM>CC/IT d- s:+ a16 C++()>$ UL>$ P---() L+++>+ E+>+ W+(-) N o? K? w--() !O M- !V PS+>+

HHHEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!

2000-07-04 Thread Dennis Heuer
God damned I try to get out of this list since months, couldn't reach list master and wasn't found in the list-index to be deleted automatically. Then TWO TIMES since two weeks ago I got the reply that I was cleared out from this list but I AM STILL IN SOMEBOD

Re: using password aging with ssh

2000-07-04 Thread Ron Rademaker
Gotten this from the release critical bugreport (last one): Package: ssh (non-US/main) Maintainer: Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [HELP] Need fix. (RB) 51747 ssh: can't handle expired passwords 64424 ssh: ssh believes that xauth lives in /usr/openwin/bin [STRATEGY] Needs to be recompil

Re: using password aging with ssh

2000-07-04 Thread Alexander Hvostov
Thomas, The old password is requested first.. ;P Regards, Alex. --- PGP/GPG Fingerprint: EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS/CM>CC/IT d- s:+ a16 C++()>$ UL>$ P---() L+++>+ E+>+ W+(-) N o? K? w--() !O M- !V PS+>+ PE- Y

Re: HHHEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!

2000-07-04 Thread Luca Filipozzi
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 11:52:25AM -0700, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > Dennis, > > We don't want you to leave debian-security. ;) Welcome to the Hotel California... :) -- Luca Filipozzi [dpkg] We are the apt. Resistance is futile. You will be packaged. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT

Re: HHHEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!

2000-07-04 Thread Alexander Hvostov
Dennis, We don't want you to leave debian-security. ;) Regards, Alex. --- PGP/GPG Fingerprint: EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS/CM>CC/IT d- s:+ a16 C++()>$ UL>$ P---() L+++>+ E+>+ W+(-) N o? K? w--() !O M- !V PS+>+

HHHEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!

2000-07-04 Thread Dennis Heuer
God damned I try to get out of this list since months, couldn't reach list master and wasn't found in the list-index to be deleted automatically. Then TWO TIMES since two weeks ago I got the reply that I was cleared out from this list but I AM STILL IN SOMEBO

Re: using password aging with ssh

2000-07-04 Thread Alexander Hvostov
Thomas, The old password is requested first.. ;P Regards, Alex. --- PGP/GPG Fingerprint: EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS/CM>CC/IT d- s:+ a16 C++()>$ UL>$ P---() L+++>+ E+>+ W+(-) N o? K? w--() !O M- !V PS+>+ PE- Y

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
"L. Besselink" wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, monte wrote: > > > Hi: > >You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. > > We > > couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste > > time with Linux. > > Probably because it's a more stabl

Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions]

2000-07-04 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
Tim wrote: > heh, it wont even boot on my athlon let alone be stable I had to use the test (potato) boot disks, I believe. The problem is just that the old kernels won't boot athlon. Compile a new kernel (the latest 2.2.x should do) and make a boot disk (dunno how to make a bootdisk using the .

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
monte wrote: >You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. We > couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste > time > with Linux. I guess you smell Linux money. Interesting troll. Windows sucks, so I used OS/2. MS forked (hmm) OS/2

using password aging with ssh

2000-07-04 Thread thomas lakofski
Hi, Is the above possible? That is, when a user's password has expired, they should be prompted to change it somehow. Works with telnet but that seems to defeat the point entirely. The behaviour as is, is that sshd just gives access denied when the password has aged, even if the second (expirat

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
"L. Besselink" wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, monte wrote: > > > Hi: > >You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. We > > couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste > > time with Linux. > > Probably because it's a more stable se

Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions]

2000-07-04 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
Tim wrote: > heh, it wont even boot on my athlon let alone be stable I had to use the test (potato) boot disks, I believe. The problem is just that the old kernels won't boot athlon. Compile a new kernel (the latest 2.2.x should do) and make a boot disk (dunno how to make a bootdisk using the

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
monte wrote: >You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. We > couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste time > with Linux. I guess you smell Linux money. Interesting troll. Windows sucks, so I used OS/2. MS forked (hmm) OS/2 a

using password aging with ssh

2000-07-04 Thread thomas lakofski
Hi, Is the above possible? That is, when a user's password has expired, they should be prompted to change it somehow. Works with telnet but that seems to defeat the point entirely. The behaviour as is, is that sshd just gives access denied when the password has aged, even if the second (expira

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread L. Besselink
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, monte wrote: > Hi: >You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. We > couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste > time with Linux. Probably because it's a more stable server platform and that's where he keeps al

Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions]

2000-07-04 Thread Tim
heh, it wont even boot on my athlon let alone be stable tim. Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product. -- Ferenc Mantfeld On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Christopher W. Curtis wrote: > Nathan Paul Simons wrote: > > > > Yeah, but a lot of our users like to use

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread L. Besselink
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, monte wrote: > Hi: >You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. We > couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste > time with Linux. Probably because it's a more stable server platform and that's where he keeps a

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread monte
Hi: You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. We couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste time with Linux. I guess you smell Linux money. "Christopher W. Curtis" wrote: > Martin Bogomolni wrote: > > > > Okay, I think the s/n ra

Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions]

2000-07-04 Thread Tim
heh, it wont even boot on my athlon let alone be stable tim. Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product. -- Ferenc Mantfeld On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Christopher W. Curtis wrote: > Nathan Paul Simons wrote: > > > > Yeah, but a lot of our users like to use