Brian May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Another option: perhaps some sort of mail <--> WWW gateway might
> work. With SSL encryption... Not sure what free mail <--> WWW gateways
> exist, I am sure somebody can fill in the details for me.
i'm lucky enough to subscribe to an isp owned by a hardcore p
Good morning, all... I expect that this is the correct forum for
this question, but if not, please point me in the right direction?
I am working my way through an implementation of David Ranch's
TrinityOs installation, with my own modifications for Debian.
After locking down inet.d, and impleme
On 27 Mar 2000, Brian May wrote:
> I think some programs use port 25 for outgoing mail, too (netscape?
> pine? mh?).
True. In which case block port 25 on all _external_ interfaces (eth0, ppp0
etc) but leave it open on the loopback interface.
--
Zak Kipling.
"As long as the superstition that pe
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sebastian> On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> i like the idea of denying all incoming packets on port 25.
Sebastian> why not do it? port 25 is only for incoming mail, so
Sebastian> block it if you don'
> "Jacob" == Jacob Kuntz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jacob> that solution has its problems. public key cryptography
Jacob> implimented in java is vulnerable to man-in-the-middle
Jacob> attacks unless it is able to save some data to disk between
Jacob> sessions. i'm not an exper
5 matches
Mail list logo
