> From the original bug report (the only thing I had up to know):
I attached my backtrace in the bug report. this is why we are speaking about
different things;)
> Then if the gdb backtrace in the original bug report is to be trusted then
> you are indeed mixing Qt4 and Qt5. And you can expect
> Hi Picca! Please next time you reassign a bug also CC the maintainer/team that
> receives the bug, else we don't get this very text you wrote above :-)
sorry about that.
> No, this not seems to be a Qt bug, and even less a Qt5 bug, as the lib
> mentioned in the backtrace is from Qt4. By looking