On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 Jonathon Love wrote:
> > I'd suggest to discuss this with upstream.
> i have already. he thought i was probably right, but not enough to act
> on it.
I guess you should make your point more clear (and CC the list).
Otherwise r-cran-afex will not be part of the next release and
i have already. he thought i was probably right, but not enough to act
on it.
On 28/04/2016 07:08, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I'd suggest to discuss this with upstream.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.o
Hi,
I'd suggest to discuss this with upstream.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Package: ftp.debian.org,r-cran-afex
Version: 0.14-2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.3
Dear Maintainer,
I believe the r-cran-afex package violates the GPL. It is released under GPL3+,
however it has GPL2-only dependencies (r-cran-stringr, r-cran-coin,
r-crain-lsmeans),
