Am Montag, den 25.01.2016, 21:23 + schrieb Ghislain Vaillant:
> Thanks for providing the additional information I requested, Tobias.
>
> I am still puzzled by a few things. First, the build of FreeImage
> 3.17.0
> in Fedora 23 [1] and 24 [2] does not require patching the source
> code
> for
Thanks for providing the additional information I requested, Tobias.
I am still puzzled by a few things. First, the build of FreeImage 3.17.0
in Fedora 23 [1] and 24 [2] does not require patching the source code
for libpng16. This is also consistent with the fact that the FreeImage
3.17.0 sour
Am Montag, den 25.01.2016, 17:58 + schrieb Ghislain Vaillant:
> --
> Applying patch libpng16.patch
> patching file Source/FreeImage/PluginPNG.cpp
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 713.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 1000.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file
> Source/FreeImage/PluginPNG.cpp
> Patch libpng1
The patch does not cleanly apply:
--
Applying patch libpng16.patch
patching file Source/FreeImage/PluginPNG.cpp
Hunk #1 FAILED at 713.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1000.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file Source/FreeImage/PluginPNG.cpp
Patch libpng16.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
--
Thanks, Tobias, for the patch and NMU.
I have pushed your changes to ou git.
Ghis, if you have a fixed reproducibility, please push it
to git and I will upload a new version with both changes.
Regards
Anton
2016-01-25 14:57 GMT+01:00 Ghislain Vaillant :
> I was about to submit an update for th
I was about to submit an update for the reproducibility problem. I can
prepare a proper update with your patch in it.
How does that sound?
Ghis
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 06:33:52 +0100 Tobias Frost wrote:
Control: tags 742560 + patch
Control: tags 742560 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared
Control: tags 742560 + patch
Control: tags 742560 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for freeimage (versioned as 3.17.0+ds1-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru freeimage-3.17.0+ds1/debian/changelog
freeimage