On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 18:04:28 +0200 Graham Inggs wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> I've just checked eigen3 3.3.0-1 on plummer.debian.org, and it still outputs
>
> forceMatrix*axisMatrix: -1 0 0
> 0 -2 0
> 0 0 -3
>
>
I have checked with current dev. tree and problem remains
I have tried com
Hi Andreas,
spdep_0.6-5 submitted to CRAN.
Roger
On Tue, 31 May 2016, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Roger,
thanks for your work on this issue. I confirm that you have removed the
file in question from SVN and removed the usage of the compute_soi
function from init.c and the function prototype
s are
needed.
Roger
On Mon, 30 May 2016, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Roger,
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:51:57PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
Please tell them that I am not willing to make any further changes. If they
bothered to look, they would have seen that the functions are not simply
copied
soigraph.c
function names to show that they are modified from those in arm.c, but I
do not see the point.
Best wishes,
Roger
On Mon, 30 May 2016, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi again Roger,
this is just a ping in case you might have missed my last mail about the
licensing of the file copied from
pip.c
for over ten years without attracting Debian's ire.
Nicholas and I understood in 2001 that ... may be freely redistributed ...
could reasonably be taken as permission to include and redistribute these
small functions.
Do you want me to revisit the separate packaging of data sets?
Best wishe
to a separate package (EcDat is a package with only economics data sets,
maybe I can lear from it).
Best wishes,
Roger
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Roger,
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:33:21AM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
What is the r-cran-maptools issue - I'm also the mainta
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Roger,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:42:06PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Given surveillance rather than my (wrong) guess, I'm willing to do
what I can - I agree that actual use in epidemiology is worth
facilitating. Should the soi
e maintainer of that
package? I'm not aware of what might be non-free there; maybe the data
files for examples and testing? Nobody has asked me about that.
Best wishes,
Roger
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Roger,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:47:34PM +0200, Roger Biv
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Roger,
I'm very astonished that this thread which started with two very simple
questions exagerated to such a time consuming discussion.
Most questions are not as simple as they appear, think ontologies. Mine
differs from yours. You haven&#
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Roger,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:36:22PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
Hi Andreas,
This isn't a patch to my spdep/inst/README file.
No, it's not! :-)
I have no knowledge
of any debian/copyright file, and cannot take responsibilit
hing about their
packaging systems other than very bad experiences with people with messed
up GIS packages). If you want me to patch anything, diff from
spdep/inst/README on R-forge. In particular:
Copyright: 2005 Yongwan Chun, Michael Tiefelsdorf and Roger Bivand
License: GPL-2+
looks very wrong
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Roger,
I tried to package spdep for Debian on behalf of the Debian Science team.
The Debian ftpmaster had some issues before he will accept the package.
Could you please clarify the points below.
Thanks a lot and also thanks for
12 matches
Mail list logo
