On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Drew Parsons wrote:
> It's still failing, with python-ffc 2016.2.0-3 and libdolfin-dev
> 2016.2.0-4 (with UseDOLFIN.cmake patched).
Oh, sorry I forgot that this patch is needed for instant:
https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/instant/commits/67be09da6e9cd8907bddba
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Should the vtk section in UseDOLFIN.cmake be controlled with some
> python3 test, so VTK is still pulled in for python2?
Yes, we can do that, although I believe the vtk section in
UseDOLFIN.cmake is not important. I will make a patch.
Johann
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Weird, the new python3 module seems to have broken the python2 dolfin
> module. That's not good.
>
> Importing dolfin gives the error:
> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'cpp'
The problem is that the Python 2 modules for dolf
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Drew Parsons wrote:
> $ instant-clean-3
> $ ipython3
> Python 3.5.3 (default, Jan 19 2017, 14:11:04)
> In [1]: from fenics import * # dolfin module behaves the same
> In [2]: mesh = UnitSquareMesh(2, 2)
> In [3]: V = FunctionSpace(mesh, 'P', 1)
> In [4]: u = inter
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Hagen Fuchs wrote:
> Fenics/Dolfin contains the core module 'mshr' which deals in meshes.
> All current examples seem to be employing 'mshr', eg.
> https://fenicsproject.org/qa/9414/fenics-mesh-generation-mark-inner-region
No, not really - none of the demo program
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Johannes Ring wrote:
> The package will be maintained in Debian Science Team's Git
> repository.
I have packaged dijitso locally but when I try to create a repository
at https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/fenics/dijitso.git
I get a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Johannes Ring
X-Debbugs-Cc:
debian-de...@lists.debian.org,debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: dijitso
Version: 2016.2.0
Upstream Author: Martin Sandve Alnæs
* URL: https://fenicsproject.org
* License: LGPL-3
Hi Drew,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
> Changes:
> dolfin (2016.1.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Disable HDF5 support.
> HDF5 was never actually enabled previously due to a discrepant
> configuration between serial and parallel HDF5, but that no
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> when checking reverse dependencies of insighttoolkit3 and vtk5 I
> stumbled upon vmtk. I noticed that the project moved to Github and has
> a new version. Unfortunately it seems there was no switch to
> insighttoolkit4 and vtk6
dolfin version 1.6.0 will fix this problem. It is currently sitting in the
new queue.
Johannes
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:09 PM Chris West (Faux) <
solo-debianb...@goeswhere.com> wrote:
> Source: dolfin
> Version: 1.5.0-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
> Tags: sid
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:03 AM Massimiliano Leoni <
leoni.massimilia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Versions of packages fenics depends on:
> ii dolfin-bin 1.5.0-2
> ii dolfin-doc 1.5.0-2
> ii libdolfin-dev 1.5.0-2
> ii python-dolfin 1.5.0-2
>
I can't reproduce this with the latest dolf
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Ok, please go ahead now. To upload to unstable from experimental, just add a
> changelog entry with "Upload to unstable" and an incremented version.
Thank you, I have uploaded dolfin to unstable now.
> Your only r-dep is fenics, which
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2015-05-12 09:07, Johannes Ring wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Joachim Reichel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> dolfin is now the only reverse dependency hold
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Johannes Ring wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Joachim Reichel
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> dolfin is now the only reverse dependency holding up the libcgal11
>> transition.
>>
>> What are the options?
>> (
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Joachim Reichel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> dolfin is now the only reverse dependency holding up the libcgal11 transition.
>
> What are the options?
> (1) Fix dolfin without causing another transition
> (2) Remove dolfin from testing
> (3) Upload 1.5.0-1 from experimental to
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> feel free to add a row at bottom of the SoB page:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB
Thanks, I have added this now.
Johannes
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth
Hi Massimiliano,
Do you still have this problem? If so, can you please give us some
more information? For instance, what do you get when you run the
following command?
# apt-get -s dist-upgrade
Johannes
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Massimiliano Leoni
wrote:
> Package: fenics
> Version: 1:1
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:35 AM, peter green wrote:
> peter green wrote:
>>
>> I've been doing some tests on this interestingly it failed for me much
>> earlier than on the buildd, maybe different systems give slightly different
>> ammounts of usable address space or something. Anyway reducing op
18 matches
Mail list logo
