Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 12:37:24 +0800
Source: scalapack
Binary: libscalapack-openmpi2.0 libscalapack-mpich2.0 libscalapack-mpi-dev
libscalapack-mpich-dev libscalapack-openmpi-dev scalapack-mpi-test
scalapack-test-common
Arc
scalapack_2.0.2-1exp5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
scalapack_2.0.2-1exp5.dsc
scalapack_2.0.2-1exp5.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-scienc
FYI: The status of the mathgl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.3.4-1.1
Current version: 2.4.1-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receiv
FYI: The status of the ros-rospack source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.4.1-1
Current version: 2.4.1-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rec
FYI: The status of the fityk source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.3.0-1
Current version: 1.3.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
l
Source: caffe-contrib
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid buster
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-7
caffe-contrib FTBFS since GCC-7 was made the default compiler:
[...]
[ 0%] Building CXX object
src/caffe/CMakeFiles/caffeproto.dir/__/__/include/caffe/proto/caffe.pb
On Sun, 06 Aug 2017 21:31:43 -0400, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Here's a patch fixing the regexps in the helper scripts and making
> the build succedd.
2nd try
Cheeers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
: :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + patch
Bug #870821 [src:esys-particle] esys-particle FTBFS with perl 5.26
Added tag(s) patch.
--
870821: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870821
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
debian-science-main
Control: tag -1 + patch
On Sat, 05 Aug 2017 17:30:46 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: esys-particle
> Version: 2.3.5+dfsg1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/esys-particle.html
>
> ...
> ./makeglos.pl paper.glo
> Unescaped left brace
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 871097 src:insighttoolkit4
Bug #871097 [src:ants] ants: FTBFS: vcl_compiler.h:79:4: error: #error "Dunno
about this gcc"
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ants' to 'src:insighttoolkit4'.
No longer marked as found in versions ants/2.1.0-5.
Source: python-xarray
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 00:11:19 +0200
Source: r-cran-rsdmx
Binary: r-cran-rsdmx
Architecture: source
Version: 0.5.9+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Sébastien Villemo
Source: r-cran-randomfields
Version: 3.1.36-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ma
r-cran-rsdmx_0.5.9+dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
r-cran-rsdmx_0.5.9+dfsg-1.dsc
r-cran-rsdmx_0.5.9+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
r-cran-rsdmx_0.5.9+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
r-cran-rsdmx_0.5.9+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Source: ros-dynamic-reconfigure
Version: 1.5.46-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: ros-std-msgs
Version: 0.5.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Source: ros-ros-comm
Version: 1.12.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 776567 serious
Bug #776567 [src:mclibs] mclibs: FTBFS - segfault in testsuite
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
776567: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 870217 serious
Bug #870217 [src:glm] glm: FTBFS with gcc-7: Test failures
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
870217: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Source: hfst
Version: 3.10.0~r2798-3
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash .
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 23:55:50 +0200
Source: glpk-java
Binary: libglpk-java
Architecture: source
Version: 1.10.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Sébastien Villemot
Desc
Source: ros-bond-core
Version: 1.7.18-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Source: tiemu
Version: 3.03-nogdb+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -c
Source: ros-ros-comm-msgs
Version: 1.11.2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make
Source: skimage
Version: 0.12.3-9
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: gringo
Version: 5.1.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -o build/rel
Source: ros-common-msgs
Version: 1.12.5-3
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3
Source: ros-image-common
Version: 1.11.11-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make
Source: ros-geometry-experimental
Version: 0.5.13-5
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully)
Source: ros-pcl-msgs
Version: 0.2.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: E
Source: ros-geometry
Version: 1.11.8-4
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Source: ros-navigation-msgs
Version: 1.13.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ma
glpk-java_1.10.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
glpk-java_1.10.0-1.dsc
glpk-java_1.10.0.orig.tar.gz
glpk-java_1.10.0-1.debian.tar.xz
glpk-java_1.10.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 22:04:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#853603: fixed in ovito 2.9.0+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #853603,
regarding ovito: ftbfs with GCC-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 23:51:38 +0200
Source: ovito
Binary: ovito ovito-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 2.9.0+dfsg1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Changed-By: Anton Gladky
ovito_2.9.0+dfsg1-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ovito_2.9.0+dfsg1-1.dsc
ovito_2.9.0+dfsg1.orig.tar.xz
ovito_2.9.0+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
ovito_2.9.0+dfsg1-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debia
binary:scram-gui is NEW.
binary:scram-gui is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are routinely proces
scram_0.14.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
scram_0.14.0-1.dsc
scram_0.14.0.orig.tar.gz
scram_0.14.0-1.debian.tar.xz
scram-dbgsym_0.14.0-1_amd64.deb
scram-gui-dbgsym_0.14.0-1_amd64.deb
scram-gui_0.14.0-1_amd64.deb
scram_0.14.0-1_amd64.buildinf
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:ros-bond-core
Bug #871042 [python-genpy] python-genpy: missing dependency on python-yaml
Added indication that 871042 affects src:ros-bond-core
--
871042: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871042
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow.
Package: python-genpy
Version: 0.6.6-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:ros-bond-core
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/ros-bond-core.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/ros-bond-core.html
...
cd /build/1st/ros-bond-core-1.7.18/obj-x
a work around can be found at
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/332177358/cernlib_20061220+dfsg3-4.3build1_20061220+dfsg3-4.3ubuntu1.diff.gz
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-sci
Source: imview-doc
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
Hi,
Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
unstable, because:
it was in unstable at the time
Source: diet
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
Hi,
Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
unstable, because:
it was in unstable at the time of th
Source: elmerfem
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
Hi,
Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
unstable, because:
it was in unstable at the time o
Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81723
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> gfortran cwerf64.F
> E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity
that might be a GCC issue, however it would be nice to see the command line
arguments passed, and getting a test case extracted.
-
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81723
Bug #853345 [src:cernlib] cernlib: ftbfs with GCC-7
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81723'.
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #853345 [src:cernlib] cernlib: ftbfs with GCC-7
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
853345: ht
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 737834 + pending
Bug #737834 [libatlas3-base] libatlas3-base: Please provide a way to compile
shred version of libptcblas and libptf77blas
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 598571 + moreinfo
Bug #598571 [src:atlas] libatlas3gf-base: Build of atlas test programm
xsl2blastst_pt and xsl1blastst_pt failed
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
598571
Dear Ferran,
A long time ago, you reported the following bug report against the Debian
package for ATLAS:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:11:21 +0200 Ferran Obón Santacana
wrote:
> Package: libatlas3gf-base
> Version: 3.8.3-27+custom1
> Severity: normal
>
> I have build a custom altas library followin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 598571 src:atlas 3.8.3-27
Bug #598571 [libatlas3gf-base] libatlas3gf-base: Build of atlas test programm
xsl2blastst_pt and xsl1blastst_pt failed
Bug reassigned from package 'libatlas3gf-base' to 'src:atlas'.
No longer marked as found in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 853601 src:tbb
Bug #853601 [src:openturns] openturns: ftbfs with GCC-7
Bug reassigned from package 'src:openturns' to 'src:tbb'.
No longer marked as found in versions openturns/1.7-3.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #85360
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 853370 src:tbb
Bug #853370 [src:deal.ii] deal.ii: ftbfs with GCC-7
Bug reassigned from package 'src:deal.ii' to 'src:tbb'.
No longer marked as found in versions deal.ii/8.4.2-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #853370 to t
Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 07:05:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#870582: fixed in scalapack 2.0.2-1exp4
has caused the Debian Bug report #870582,
regarding libscalapack-openmpi-dev: fails to upgrade from 'sid' - trying to
overwrite /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libscalapack-ope
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 14:26:31 +0800
Source: scalapack
Binary: libscalapack-openmpi2.0 libscalapack-mpich2.0 libscalapack-mpi-dev
libscalapack-mpich-dev libscalapack-openmpi-dev scalapack-mpi-test
scalapack-test-common
Arc
54 matches
Mail list logo