Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 10:21:09 +0530
Source: apertium-es-gl
Binary: apertium-es-gl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.8~r57542-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Kartik Mis
apertium-es-gl_1.0.8~r57542-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apertium-es-gl_1.0.8~r57542-2.dsc
apertium-es-gl_1.0.8~r57542-2.debian.tar.xz
apertium-es-gl_1.0.8~r57542-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 09:16:20 +0530
Source: apertium-es-ca
Binary: apertium-es-ca
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.1+svn~57448-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Kartik
pytables 3.2.2-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-08-13
It is affected by these RC bugs:
829077: pytables: FTBFS in testing (LaTeX Error: File `iftex.sty' not found)
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.d
woo 1.0+dfsg1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-07-22
It is affected by these RC bugs:
818817: woo: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'isnan' was not declared in this scope
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debia
vitables 2.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-08-13
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
829077: pytables: FTBFS in testing (LaTeX Error: File `iftex.sty' not found)
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http:
mlpack 2.0.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-07-22
It is affected by these RC bugs:
818814: mlpack: FTBFS with libc 2.23: there are no arguments to 'isnan' that
depend on a template parameter
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.de
apertium-es-ca_1.2.1+svn~57448-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
apertium-es-ca_1.2.1+svn~57448-4.dsc
apertium-es-ca_1.2.1+svn~57448-4.debian.tar.xz
apertium-es-ca_1.2.1+svn~57448-4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 21:51:18 +0530
Source: apertium-eo-ca
Binary: apertium-eo-ca
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:0.9.1~r60655-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Kartik M
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:20:39 +0530
Source: apertium-eo-es
Binary: apertium-eo-es
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:0.9.1~r60655-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Kartik M
apertium-eo-es_0.9.1~r60655-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apertium-eo-es_0.9.1~r60655-1.dsc
apertium-eo-es_0.9.1~r60655.orig.tar.bz2
apertium-eo-es_0.9.1~r60655-1.debian.tar.xz
apertium-eo-es_0.9.1~r60655-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian
apertium-eo-ca_0.9.1~r60655-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apertium-eo-ca_0.9.1~r60655-1.dsc
apertium-eo-ca_0.9.1~r60655.orig.tar.bz2
apertium-eo-ca_0.9.1~r60655-1.debian.tar.xz
apertium-eo-ca_0.9.1~r60655-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On 08/07/16 01:45, Jerome Benoit wrote:
> Package: geomview
> Version: 1.9.5-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> it appears that the PDF documents are gzip compressed:
> as such they are accessible from The Geometric Cent
Package: geomview
Version: 1.9.5-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
it appears that the PDF documents are gzip compressed:
as such they are accessible from The Geometric Center
because it looks for ungzipped PDF documents. Note that
each PDF document might be comp
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:22:14 +0530
Source: apertium-mk-en
Binary: apertium-mk-en
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.1~r57554-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Kartik Mis
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 22:05:33 +0200
Source: flint
Binary: libflint-2.5.2 libflint-dev libflint-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 2.5.2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Change
flint_2.5.2-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flint_2.5.2-6.dsc
flint_2.5.2-6.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alio
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 18:45:11 +0200
Source: gle-graphics
Binary: gle-graphics
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.2.5-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Changed-By: Christian T
gle-graphics_4.2.5-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gle-graphics_4.2.5-6.dsc
gle-graphics_4.2.5-6.debian.tar.xz
gle-graphics-dbgsym_4.2.5-6_amd64.deb
gle-graphics_4.2.5-6_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.
On 09/03/14 at 22:26 +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> Package: libpetsc3.4.2
> Version: 3.4.2.dfsg1-6
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.3
> User: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: scotch-license-issues
>
> Hello,
> the library /usr/lib/libpetsc.s
Hi Chris,
I need to admit that I can not reproduce the problem
...
d-shlibmove --commit \
--multiarch \
--devunversioned \
--override s/libf2clibf2c.so-dev/libf2c2-dev/ \
--movedev INCLUDE/blaswrap.h usr/include \
*/BLAS/SRC/libcblas.s
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 18:59:24 +0530
Source: apertium-oc-es
Binary: apertium-oc-es
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.6~r57551-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Kartik Mis
Version check failed:
Your upload included the source package apertium-eo-ca, version 0.9.1~r60655-1,
however testing already has version 1:0.9.0~r61315-1.
Uploads to unstable must have a higher version than present in testing.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understa
apertium-eo-ca_0.9.1~r60655-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apertium-eo-ca_0.9.1~r60655-1.dsc
apertium-eo-ca_0.9.1~r60655.orig.tar.bz2
apertium-eo-ca_0.9.1~r60655-1.debian.tar.xz
apertium-eo-ca_0.9.1~r60655-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian
FYI: The status of the pyzo source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.1-3
Current version: 4.2.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
late
FYI: The status of the dune-functions source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.4~20160406ge6b3b4c-1
Current version: 2.4~20160507g3dd041d-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens
[image: Inline image 1]
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 818813 serious
Bug #818813 [torcs] torcs: FTBFS with libc 2.23: non-floating-point argument in
call to function '__builtin_isnan'
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 818814 serious
Bug #818814 [mlpack] mlpack: FTBFS wit
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 11:51:09 +0530
Source: apertium-isl-eng
Binary: apertium-isl-eng
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.0~r66083-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Kartik
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 07:17:07PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Debian FTP Masters
>> wrote:
>> > apertium-isl-eng_0.1.0~r66083-1.dsc: Does not match file already existing
>> > in the pool.
>>
>> Why this w
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 11:32:01 +0200
Source: apertium-urd-hin
Binary: apertium-urd-hin
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.0~r64379-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Tino D
apertium-oc-es_1.0.6~r57551-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apertium-oc-es_1.0.6~r57551-2.dsc
apertium-oc-es_1.0.6~r57551-2.debian.tar.xz
apertium-oc-es_1.0.6~r57551-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 07:17:07PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Debian FTP Masters
> wrote:
> > apertium-isl-eng_0.1.0~r66083-1.dsc: Does not match file already existing
> > in the pool.
>
> Why this was rejected? I thought I'll update fixed version and I
> haven
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 19:03:22 +0530
Source: apertium-br-fr
Binary: apertium-br-fr
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5.0~r61325-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Kartik Mis
apertium-br-fr_0.5.0~r61325-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apertium-br-fr_0.5.0~r61325-2.dsc
apertium-br-fr_0.5.0~r61325-2.debian.tar.xz
apertium-br-fr_0.5.0~r61325-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
> apertium-isl-eng_0.1.0~r66083-1.dsc: Does not match file already existing in
> the pool.
Hi,
Why this was rejected? I thought I'll update fixed version and I
haven't got Accepted message for earlier package yet. Should I try
again afte
binary:apertium-mk-en is NEW.
source:apertium-mk-en is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are routin
apertium-isl-eng_0.1.0~r66083-1.dsc: Does not match file already existing in
the pool.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian
apertium-br-fr_0.5.0~r61062-2.dsc: Refers to non-existing file
'apertium-br-fr_0.5.0~r61062.orig.tar.bz2'
Perhaps you need to include the file in your upload?
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which ad
apertium-mk-en_0.1.1~r57554-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apertium-mk-en_0.1.1~r57554-1.dsc
apertium-mk-en_0.1.1~r57554.orig.tar.bz2
apertium-mk-en_0.1.1~r57554-1.debian.tar.xz
apertium-mk-en_0.1.1~r57554-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian
apertium-br-fr_0.5.0~r61062-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apertium-br-fr_0.5.0~r61062-2.dsc
apertium-br-fr_0.5.0~r61062-2.debian.tar.xz
apertium-br-fr_0.5.0~r61062-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
herwig++ |2.6.0-1 | armel, armhf
herwig++-dev |2.6.0-1 | armel, armhf
librivet-dev | 1.8.3-1.1 | armel, armhf
librivet11 | 1.8.3-1.1 | armel, armhf
libthepeg-dev |1.8.0-1 |
apertium-isl-eng_0.1.0~r66083-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apertium-isl-eng_0.1.0~r66083-1.dsc
apertium-isl-eng_0.1.0~r66083.orig.tar.bz2
apertium-isl-eng_0.1.0~r66083-1.debian.tar.xz
apertium-isl-eng_0.1.0~r66083-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Yo
Your message dated Thu, 7 Jul 2016 13:48:00 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#830206: libmpfi-dev: undefined symbol:
mpfi_is_strictly_neg_default
has caused the Debian Bug report #830206,
regarding libmpfi-dev: undefined symbol: mpfi_is_strictly_neg_default
to be marked as done.
Thi
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Chris Lamb
wrote:
> lexchoicebil.xsl
I'll be reuploading apertium-isl-eng and fixing rest of packages soon.
Sorry for missing it!
--
Kartik Mistry | IRC: kart_
{0x1f1f, kartikm}.wordpress.com
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainer
Jerome BENOIT:
> Hello Ximin, thanks for your report.
>
> [..]
>
>> This function is present in the source code, but not in the compiled .so for
>> some reason. I will investigate further in the meantime, but any tips on this
>> would be appreciated.
>
> A script version is created on fly (see d
lexchoicebil.xsl ...
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
lexchoicebil.xsl
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
lexchoicebil.xsl again..
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Another missing alicante reference..
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 14:56:22 +0530
Source: apertium-oc-ca
Binary: apertium-oc-ca
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.6~r57551-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Kartik Mis
binary:apertium-urd-hin is NEW.
source:apertium-urd-hin is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are ro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Ximin, thanks for your report.
On 07/07/16 12:10, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Package: libmpfi-dev
> Version: 1.5.1+ds-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When trying to compile Sage 7.1 as described in
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianS
apertium-urd-hin_0.1.0~r64379-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apertium-urd-hin_0.1.0~r64379-1.dsc
apertium-urd-hin_0.1.0~r64379.orig.tar.bz2
apertium-urd-hin_0.1.0~r64379-1.debian.tar.xz
apertium-urd-hin_0.1.0~r64379-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Yo
apertium-oc-ca_1.0.6~r57551-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apertium-oc-ca_1.0.6~r57551-2.dsc
apertium-oc-ca_1.0.6~r57551-2.debian.tar.xz
apertium-oc-ca_1.0.6~r57551-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian
Package: libmpfi-dev
Version: 1.5.1+ds-4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When trying to compile Sage 7.1 as described in
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Sage
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/sagemath.git/
Sage compiles successfully but the resulting binary crashe
ACL dm: not allowed to upload source package 'orocos-kdl'
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.ali
orocos-kdl_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
orocos-kdl_1.3.1+dfsg-1.dsc
orocos-kdl_1.3.1+dfsg.orig.tar.xz
orocos-kdl_1.3.1+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
liborocos-kdl-dev_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
liborocos-kdl1.3-dbgsym_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
libo
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 11:51:58 +0530
Source: apertium-mk-bg
Binary: apertium-mk-bg
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.0~r49489-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Kartik Mis
please clarify lexchoicebil.xsl on next upload
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
please clarify lexchoicebil.xsl on next upload
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
binary:apertium-mk-bg is NEW.
source:apertium-mk-bg is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are routin
62 matches
Mail list logo
