Bug#827032: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: apertium-fr-ca | 1.0.3~r61322-1 | source, all --- Reason --- ROM; Replaced by apertium-fra-cat -- Note that the

Bug#809434: marked as done (apertium-apy: Package should be arch all (complicates python3 transition))

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:09:34 +0530 with message-id and subject line Fixed in 0.9.1~r343-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #809434, regarding apertium-apy: Package should be arch all (complicates python3 transition) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

slepc 3.6.3.dfsg1-6 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the slepc source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.6.3.dfsg1-4 Current version: 3.6.3.dfsg1-6 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you wi

Re: Could Debian Perl team take over PDL?

On 06/03/2016 10:55 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 06/03/2016 10:07 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: >> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:02:32PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> I've got a request from PDL upstream who fully correctly noticed that >>> PDL is not properly maintained inside Debian. Since I once

my article

Hey, Have you read the latest article written by me? Just take a look, it's very interesting. Please read here My Best, Paul Gevers -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.