toulbar2_0.9.8-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:toulbar2 is NEW. source:toulbar2 is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processe

Bug#812847: marked as done (coala: FTBFS: scanner.cpp:662:9: error: no match for 'operator=')

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 06:13:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#823129: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #812847, regarding coala: FTBFS: scanner.cpp:662:9: error: no match for 'operator=' to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#823572: sympow: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)

2016-05-05 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: sympow Version: 1.023-6 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright file after an upgrade, which is a violation of Policy 12.5: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyr

Bug#823129: Removed package(s) from unstable

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: coala |1.0.1-5 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x coala | 1.0.1-5+b1 | armhf, hurd-i386

Bug#823129: Removed package(s) from unstable

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 1.0.1-5+rm Dear submitter, as the package coala has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/823129 The ver

Ma boîte aux lettres est inondée...

2016-05-05 Thread Professeur Joyeux
Ma boîte e-mail est inondée... .span_textbody_default { font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important; font-size: 14px !important; line-height: 20px !important; } .span_standard_default { font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important; font-size: 14px !important; line-height: 20px !im

Bug#822036: marked as done (vtk: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch,indep} targets)

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 05:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #822036, regarding vtk: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch,indep} targets to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Bug#812295: marked as done (vtk: FTBFS with GCC 6: cmake error)

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 05:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #812295, regarding vtk: FTBFS with GCC 6: cmake error to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#750209: marked as done (Use system installed alglib)

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 05:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #750209, regarding Use system installed alglib to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#750210: marked as done (Use system installed proj4)

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 05:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #750210, regarding Use system installed proj4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#796219: marked as done (configure_file called with unknown argument(s): COPY_ONLY)

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 05:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #796219, regarding configure_file called with unknown argument(s): COPY_ONLY to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#731843: marked as done (Remove *.java code from vtk.jar)

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 05:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #731843, regarding Remove *.java code from vtk.jar to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#798164: marked as done (vtk: do not ship in stretch)

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 05:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #798164, regarding vtk: do not ship in stretch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#645042: marked as done (please provide python-vtk-dbg package with dynamic libraries built against python*-dbg)

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 05:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #645042, regarding please provide python-vtk-dbg package with dynamic libraries built against python*-dbg to be marked as done. This m

Bug#551991: marked as done (python-vtk: Segmentation Fault when adding a scene)

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 05:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #551991, regarding python-vtk: Segmentation Fault when adding a scene to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#539362: marked as done (crashes when importing VRML file (containing PROTO))

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 05:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #346182, regarding crashes when importing VRML file (containing PROTO) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#346182: marked as done (crashes when importing VRML file (containing PROTO))

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 05:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #346182, regarding crashes when importing VRML file (containing PROTO) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#561396: marked as done (libvtk-java: No rule to make target `/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/jre/lib/amd64/libjawt.so')

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 05:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #561396, regarding libvtk-java: No rule to make target `/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/jre/lib/amd64/libjawt.so' to be marked as done. This

Bug#674262: marked as done (python-vtk: /usr/lib/libvtk*PythonD.so* depends on python without being explicit)

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2016 05:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #674262, regarding python-vtk: /usr/lib/libvtk*PythonD.so* depends on python without being explicit to be marked as done. This means t

Processing of toulbar2_0.9.8-1_amd64.changes

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
toulbar2_0.9.8-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: toulbar2_0.9.8-1.dsc toulbar2_0.9.8.orig.tar.xz toulbar2_0.9.8-1.debian.tar.xz toulbar2-dbgsym_0.9.8-1_amd64.deb toulbar2_0.9.8-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on hos

Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 5.10.1+dfsg-2.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package vtk has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/822321 T

Bug#822321: Removed package(s) from unstable

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libvtk-java | 5.10.1+dfsg-2.1+b1 | hurd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel libvtk-java | 5.10.1+dfsg-2.1+b2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, powerpc, ppc64el, s

r-cran-maptree_1.4-7-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:r-cran-maptree is NEW. source:r-cran-maptree is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routin

Processing of r-cran-maptree_1.4-7-1_amd64.changes

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
r-cran-maptree_1.4-7-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: r-cran-maptree_1.4-7-1.dsc r-cran-maptree_1.4-7.orig.tar.gz r-cran-maptree_1.4-7-1.debian.tar.xz r-cran-maptree_1.4-7-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host fran

Bug#823550: Acknowledgement (dune-functions: FTBFS with glibc 2.23)

2016-05-05 Thread Logan Rosen
Sorry, this is actually probably caused by GCC 6. On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. > > This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message > has been received. > > Your message is being forward

ngspice_26-1.1_multi.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:50:13 +0200 Source: ngspice Binary: ngspice tclspice ngspice-doc Architecture: all amd64 i386 source Version: 26-1.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Team Changed-B

Bug#813119: marked as done (ngspice: FTBFS with nonexistant $HOME)

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2016 22:25:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#813119: fixed in ngspice 26-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #813119, regarding ngspice: FTBFS with nonexistant $HOME to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#823550: dune-functions: FTBFS with glibc 2.23

2016-05-05 Thread Logan Rosen
Package: dune-functions Version: 2.4~20160406ge6b3b4c-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu yakkety ubuntu-patch Dear Maintainer, dune-functions FTBFS in Ubuntu because we switched to glibc 2.23, which apparently changed the behavior of std::ac

Processed: reassign 820447 to oxygen5-icon-theme, fixed 820447 in 5.21.0-1, affects 820447 ...

2016-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 820447 oxygen5-icon-theme 5.19.0-1 Bug #820447 {Done: Maximiliano Curia } [libkf5libkdepim5,oxygen5-icon-theme] libkf5libkdepim5,oxygen5-icon-theme: error when trying to install together Bug reassigned from package 'libkf5libkdepim5,oxy

sfepy_2016.1-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 21:06:05 +0200 Source: sfepy Binary: python-sfepy python-sfepy-doc Architecture: source Version: 2016.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Changed-By: Anton

Processing of sfepy_2016.1-3_source.changes

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
sfepy_2016.1-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sfepy_2016.1-3.dsc sfepy_2016.1-3.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.

Processing of sfepy_2016.1-3_source.changes

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
sfepy_2016.1-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: sfepy_2016.1-3.dsc sfepy_2016.1-3.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-mainta

suitesparse_4.5.3~beta-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental, experimental

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 15:18:26 +0200 Source: suitesparse Binary: libamd2 libbtf1 libcamd2 libcolamd2 libccolamd2 libcholmod3 libcxsparse3 libklu1 libldl2 libumfpack5 librbio2 libspqr2 libsuitesparseconfig4 libsuitesparse-d

Bug#823529: paraview-python: Cannot import vtk inside pvpython

2016-05-05 Thread Ganesh Vijayakumar
Package: paraview-python Version: 5.0.1+dfsg1-4 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? I'm unable to import the vtk module inside pvpython. I would like to be able to use the vtk.numpy_interface.dataset_adapter module/package. Strangely, this works when using j

tango_9.2.2+dfsg-1~exp3_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2016-05-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:44:04 +0200 Source: tango Binary: liblog4tango5v5 liblog4tango-dev liblog4tango-doc libtango9 libtango-dev libtango-doc libtango-tools tango-common tango-db tango-starter tango-accesscontrol tango-