Processed: Re: Bug#821876: libfeel++-dev: Depends on libvtk5-dev, which will be removed

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #821876 [libfeel++-dev] libfeel++-dev: Depends on libvtk5-dev, which will be removed Added tag(s) pending. -- 821876: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821876 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#821876: libfeel++-dev: Depends on libvtk5-dev, which will be removed

control: tag -1 pending On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 08:09:15AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > Package: libfeel++-dev ... > Your package depends on vtk 5.x, which should not be in stretch. > Please switch to vtk 6.x or drop the dependency. On it. Currently struggling to have it built, this thing require

Processed: libfeel++-dev: Depends on libvtk5-dev, which will be removed

Processing control commands: > block 798164 with -1 Bug #798164 [src:vtk] vtk: do not ship in stretch 798164 was blocked by: 798171 798170 798172 798166 801820 820632 803595 820634 798167 820635 798174 798963 803593 798169 798168 821875 798164 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 7

Bug#821876: libfeel++-dev: Depends on libvtk5-dev, which will be removed

Package: libfeel++-dev Severity: serious Justification: Depends on vtk5 Control: block 798164 with -1 Dear Maintainer, Your package depends on vtk 5.x, which should not be in stretch. Please switch to vtk 6.x or drop the dependency. -- tobi -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid A

Processed: dolfin: Build-Depends on to-be-removed vtk5

Processing control commands: > block 798164 by -1 Bug #798164 [src:vtk] vtk: do not ship in stretch 798164 was blocked by: 820635 820632 798170 798963 798167 801820 798168 798172 803595 803593 798166 798171 798174 798169 820634 798164 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 798164: 82

Bug#821875: dolfin: Build-Depends on to-be-removed vtk5

Source: dolfin Version: 1.6.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: vtk5 removal Control: block 798164 by -1 Please see #798164 for details Your package depends on vtk 5.x, which should not be in stretch. Please switch to vtk 6.x or drop the dependency. Thanks! -- tobi -- System Information:

flint is marked for autoremoval from testing

flint 2.5.2-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-05-19 It is affected by these RC bugs: 818990: flint: FTBFS: recipe for target '../build/fmpz_poly/test/t-taylor_shift_multi_mod_threaded_RUN' failed -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.

singular is marked for autoremoval from testing

singular 4.0.3+ds-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-05-19 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 818990: flint: FTBFS: recipe for target '../build/fmpz_poly/test/t-taylor_shift_multi_mod_threaded_RUN' failed -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-m

clhep is marked for autoremoval from testing

clhep 2.1.4.1-1.2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-05-11 It is affected by these RC bugs: 820797: clhep: non-free file; incomplete copyright -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Processed: Re: r-cran-tgp: FTBFS: cmath:171:3: error: template with C linkage

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible Bug #820866 [src:r-cran-tgp] r-cran-tgp: FTBFS: cmath:171:3: error: template with C linkage Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. -- 820866: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820866 Debian Bug Tracking System Conta

Bug#820866: r-cran-tgp: FTBFS: cmath:171:3: error: template with C linkage

Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible Hi Chris, On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:11:37 +0100 Chris Lamb wrote: > Source: r-cran-tgp > Version: 2.4-9-1 > r-cran-tgp fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: > /usr/include/c++/5/cmath: At global scope: > /usr/include/c++/5/cmath:171:3: error: te

pyfr_1.3.0-2_sourceupload.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 21:22:20 +0100 Source: pyfr Binary: pyfr pyfr-doc Architecture: source Version: 1.3.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Changed-By: Ghislain Antony Vailla

Bug#821766: gle-graphics: FTBFS on hurd-i386, but previously did

This could be caused by #778462  -- tobi -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of pyfr_1.3.0-2_sourceupload.changes

pyfr_1.3.0-2_sourceupload.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pyfr_1.3.0-2.dsc pyfr_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz pyfr_1.3.0-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-s

Processed: Re: elmerfem: FTBFS now also on amd64...

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #754713 [src:elmerfem] elmerfem: FTBFS on powrpc, ppc64el, s390x, hppa: The MPI version needs parpack. Disabling MPI. Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 754713 to the same value. -- 754713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

qrouter 1.3.42-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the qrouter source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.3.38-1 Current version: 1.3.42-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will recei

qflow 1.1.31-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the qflow source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.1.23-1 Current version: 1.1.31-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive

Bug#818990: Is it really a flint problem?

Hi, On 19/04/2016 12:22, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:04:31AM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: Hi, (1) according to: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=flint&suite=sid the version 2.5.2-3 of flint built perfectly on amd64. yeah, that's a past tense. (2) more rec

Hallo

Good morning, I have looked at your profile for 30 minutes at https://people.debian.org, and could not help but say hello. My name is Felicitas. I am not able to write so much here, because it is prohibited to open a dating site at my place of work, so i will suggest we have a private conver

Bug#818990: Is it really a flint problem?

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:04:31AM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: > Hi, > > (1) according to: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=flint&suite=sid > the version 2.5.2-3 of flint built perfectly on amd64. yeah, that's a past tense. > (2) more recently (yesterday) : > https://buildd.debi

Processed: Re: Bug#821419: paraview: FTBFS against ffmpeg 3.0

Processing control commands: > tag -1 upstream patch Bug #821419 [src:paraview] paraview: FTBFS against ffmpeg 3.0 Added tag(s) patch and upstream. > forwarded -1 http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=16001 Bug #821419 [src:paraview] paraview: FTBFS against ffmpeg 3.0 Set Bug forwarded-to-addres

Bug#821419: paraview: FTBFS against ffmpeg 3.0

control: tag -1 upstream patch control: forwarded -1 http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=16001 On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:29:37PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: block 820731 by -1 > > paraview FTBFS against ffmpeg 3.0: here is an upstream bug with a patch attached (I didn't test

Bug#818990: Is it really a flint problem?

Hi, (1) according to: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=flint&suite=sid the version 2.5.2-3 of flint built perfectly on amd64. (2) more recently (yesterday) : https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=flint&suite=experimental the version 2.5.2-4 of flint built perfectly on am