On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 19:59 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> [Adding debian-wb-team back to Cc]
>
> On 13/03/16 17:56, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 17:35 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > >
> > > On 13/03/16 16:34, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > >
> > What would mak
[Adding debian-wb-team back to Cc]
On 13/03/16 17:56, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 17:35 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 13/03/16 16:34, Drew Parsons wrote:
Source: petsc
Followup-For: Bug #816101
The petsc build failure on mipsel appears to be a transient problem
on
the
Hi,
> On 13 Mar 2016, at 09:48, Gianfranco Costamagna
> wrote:
>> Added in
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/keyring/keyring.git/commit/?id=bb8f943a3b54332b65cf4a64644e9e8b57bdbdcf.
>
> ok :)
>
> please do source-only uploads, or use pbuilder/sbuild to generate the
> binaries.
> If you are i
On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 17:35 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/03/16 16:34, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >
> > Source: petsc
> > Followup-For: Bug #816101
> >
> > The petsc build failure on mipsel appears to be a transient problem
> > on
> > the build machine. Please try the mipsel build again
FYI: The status of the apertium-fra-cat source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1.1.0~r64309-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple tim
FYI: The status of the apertium-swe source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.5.0~r66062-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
FYI: The status of the apertium-nno-nob source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1.1.0~r66076-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple tim
FYI: The status of the apertium-fr-ca source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.3~r61322-1
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: (no removal hint found)
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the brit
On 13/03/16 16:34, Drew Parsons wrote:
Source: petsc
Followup-For: Bug #816101
The petsc build failure on mipsel appears to be a transient problem on
the build machine. Please try the mipsel build again.
Why? It has failed twice already. Have you checked if it builds fine on a
porterbox?
Emi
Source: petsc
Followup-For: Bug #816101
The petsc build failure on mipsel appears to be a transient problem on
the build machine. Please try the mipsel build again.
gb petsc_3.6.2.dfsg1-3+b3 . mipsel
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
As far as I can tell this build failure is just some ephemeral problem
on the build machine. The same code built before, and builds now on
mips and other architectures. Trigger a rebuild, maybe it will work
now.
The orte/plm warning is a red herring. All architectures have the same
problem. It's
Hi,
>Added in
>http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/keyring/keyring.git/commit/?id=bb8f943a3b54332b65cf4a64644e9e8b57bdbdcf.
ok :)
please do source-only uploads, or use pbuilder/sbuild to generate the binaries.
If you are in doubt, don't hesitate to ask me or to the debian-mentors list :)
$ dcut -k
12 matches
Mail list logo
