Hi again,
>Is there any way in which I could get access to an armel porter box to try and
>work out what’s causing the failure?
as a normal contributor not, as a DM yes, after you requested the access, as a
DD yes.
that said, I'm happy to test patches if you have some, but I can't easily gi
Hi Gianfranco,
>> I am aware s390x is failing. I have been trying to port it, and it no longer
>> segfaults (thanks to the pexport-endian.diff patch from upstream), but one
>> part of the >build step (the compiler bootstrapping itself) exits with code
>> 1, without printing anything. That’s on
Hi,
>I am aware s390x is failing. I have been trying to port it, and it no longer
>segfaults (thanks to the pexport-endian.diff patch from upstream), but one
>part of the >build step (the compiler bootstrapping itself) exits with code 1,
>without printing anything. That’s on my list of things t
rheolef 6.6-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-03-01
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
811229: blacs-mpi: libblacs-mpich1: missing dependency on libblacs-mpich1
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://li
mumps 4.10.0.dfsg-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-03-01
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
811229: blacs-mpi: libblacs-mpich1: missing dependency on libblacs-mpich1
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
htt
getfem++ 4.2.1~beta1~svn4635~dfsg-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2016-03-01
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
811229: blacs-mpi: libblacs-mpich1: missing dependency on libblacs-mpich1
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alio
freecad 0.15.4671+dfsg1-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-02-15
It is affected by these RC bugs:
811239: freecad: FTBFS: error: template-id 'compute<>' for 'Eigen::FullPivLU
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists
Source: libvigraimpex
Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-11
Severity: wishlist
As suggested by Tobias Frost, Vigra should support multiarch.
DS
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 09:11:52 +0100
Source: r-cran-yaml
Binary: r-cran-yaml
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.1.13-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Joost van Baal-Ilić
D
Hi Gianfranco,
Is there any way in which I could get access to an armel porter box to try and
work out what’s causing the failure?
Thanks,
James
> On 24 Jan 2016, at 20:26, James Clarke wrote:
>
> I am aware s390x is failing. I have been trying to port it, and it no longer
> segfaults (thanks
I am aware s390x is failing. I have been trying to port it, and it no longer
segfaults (thanks to the pexport-endian.diff patch from upstream), but one part
of the build step (the compiler bootstrapping itself) exits with code 1,
without printing anything. That’s on my list of things to talk to
Sure, thanks for the kind words for the former maintainers :)
Btw s390x and x32 just failed to build, you might want to poke upstream about a
porting, and ping me about testing patches on porter boxes :)
If you want ti maintain some other packages you might even consider applying
for Debian Con
On 24.01.2016 18:04, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Control: block 650601 by -1
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> any progress?
>
> I'm nagging because this library is a reverse B-D for some pacakages --
> blocking the libpng transition.
>
> Tobi
Hi Tobias,
I can't get the isolated "compatibility fixes for numpy 1.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:45:16 +
Source: polyml
Binary: polyml libpolyml-dev libpolyml6
Architecture: source
Version: 5.5.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Changed-By: James
Oh right, I wasn’t aware such a thing was the done thing; I was just using
xindy (just so happened to see that someone took over maintenance of it on
debian-devel) as a reference. Of course it goes without saying that I’m
grateful for all the work Lionel and Achim have done on it; I hope nobody
I uploaded it a few seconds ago, hopefully it will appear before the next
dinstall
(due in 12 minutes), and then start building everywhere.
BTW nitpick, usually on changelog when a person takes over a package maintenance
is used to say somthing like
"take over the package maintenance
- thanks Li
Hi Gianfranco (cc’d Lionel and Achim as this upload officially makes me
uploader),
Many thanks; I’ll push the changes to debian-science/polyml.git.
Regards,
James
> On 24 Jan 2016, at 19:36, Gianfranco Costamagna
> wrote:
>
> Signed&Uploading in a few minutes!
>
> thanks for your contributio
polyml_5.5.2-4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
polyml_5.5.2-4.dsc
polyml_5.5.2-4.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.
Signed&Uploading in a few minutes!
thanks for your contribution to Debian!
cheers,
Gianfranco
Il Domenica 24 Gennaio 2016 14:54, James Clarke ha scritto:
Hi Gianfranco,
> 1) you took over the package maintenance, can I see a post where the current
> uploaders acked the change?
Please se
Processing control commands:
> block 650601 by -1
Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6
650601 was blocked by: 641889 809949 810197 662443 810201 662476 636998 809941
650567 809879 809955 809898 809873 810176 809960 809883 810202 809948 742569
810175 809938 809951 809942 80988
Control: block -1 by 811370
B-D is RC-buggy.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Control: block 650601 by -1
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:59:43 +0100 Daniel Stender wrote:
> I've begun to test the patch and for starters it doesn't clearly
apply to the
> code of the recent upstream tarball (they haven't released for too
long, +1116 commits) ...
>
> I'll work some more on that cha
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 811370
Bug #809881 [src:3depict] 3depict: FTBFS with libpng16
809881 was not blocked by any bugs.
809881 was blocking: 650601
Added blocking bug(s) of 809881: 811370
--
809881: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809881
Debian Bug Tracking
FYI: The status of the r-cran-statmod source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.4.22-1
Current version: 1.4.23-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you wil
FYI: The status of the r-cran-coin source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.1-0-1
Current version: 1.1-2-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rec
FYI: The status of the scscp-imcce source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.1+ds1-1
Current version: 1.0.1+ds1-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the mlpack source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.12-5
Current version: 2.0.0-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the r-cran-mime source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.4-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you w
FYI: The status of the gnuplot5 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 5.0.2+dfsg1-1
Current version: 5.0.2+dfsg1-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
h5py_2.5.0-2.dsc: Does not match file already existing in the pool.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers
h5py_2.5.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
h5py_2.5.0-2.dsc
h5py_2.5.0-2.debian.tar.xz
python-h5py-dbg-dbgsym_2.5.0-2_amd64.deb
python-h5py-dbg_2.5.0-2_amd64.deb
python-h5py-dbgsym_2.5.0-2_amd64.deb
python-h5py-doc_2.5.0-2_all.deb
python-h5py_2
Hi Gianfranco,
> 1) you took over the package maintenance, can I see a post where the current
> uploaders acked the change?
Please see the entirety of this thread in debian-science:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2016/01/msg00035.html
> 2) a patch against testsuite not mentioned in ch
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:49:25 +
with message-id <56a4d665.1040...@gmail.com>
and subject line Already fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #793788,
regarding python-h5py: Please provide python3 modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 812298 0.3.0-3
Bug #812298 [libconsole-bridge-dev] FTBFS: error: 'else' without a previous 'if'
Marked as found in versions console-bridge/0.3.0-3.
> tags 812462 + sid stretch
Bug #812462 [ganglia] ganglia: [FTBFS, patch] out-of-date and mis
binary:python-h5py-dbg is NEW.
binary:python3-h5py-dbg is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are rou
h5py_2.5.0-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
h5py_2.5.0-2.dsc
h5py_2.5.0-2.debian.tar.xz
python-h5py-dbg-dbgsym_2.5.0-2_i386.deb
python-h5py-dbg_2.5.0-2_i386.deb
python-h5py-dbgsym_2.5.0-2_i386.deb
python-h5py-doc_2.5.0-2_all.deb
python-h5py_2.5.0
libpcl1.7-dbg_1.7.2-14_amd64.deb has incorrect size; deleting it
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
/pcl_1.7.2-14_amd64.changes is already present on target host:
-rw-r- 1 110 1281 10181 Jan 24 11:06 pcl_1.7.2-14_amd64.changes
Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first.
Job pcl_1.7.2-14_amd64.changes removed.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host cocci
Hi Peter
On 13 December 2015 at 01:17, peter green wrote:
> On 12/12/15 19:01, peter green wrote:
>>
>>
>> New debdiff attatched, still no intent to NMU.
>
> Sorry, debdiff at
> http://debdiffs.raspbian.org/main/a/aster/aster_11.5.0%2bdfsg2-3%2brpi1.debdiff
Thanks for your work on this!
If ther
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:47:24 +0100
Source: python-qwt
Binary: python-qwt python3-qwt python-qwt-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 0.5.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Chan
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2015 20:21:41 -0400
Source: mathicgb
Binary: mathicgb libmathicgb-dev libmathicgb0 libmathicgb-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0~git20150904-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 09:08:16 +0100
Source: guiqwt
Binary: python-guiqwt python3-guiqwt python-guiqwt-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 3.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Wow, thanks a lot Jurica ! I'll take care of it asap.
On 17.01.2016 19:52, Jurica Stanojkovic wrote:
User: debian-m...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
I have found that changing -fstack-protector-strong to -fstack-protector (for
test or for entire source) does make this issue disappear on mipsel. [..
guiqwt_3.0.2-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
guiqwt_3.0.2-1.dsc
guiqwt_3.0.2.orig.tar.gz
guiqwt_3.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian
Hi James,
>I have been working with upstream to port Poly/ML to additional architectures,
>and have backported these changes. I have uploaded 5.5.2-4 to mentors; could
>you >please check it and then upload it?
wonderful, lets review:
1) you took over the package maintenance, can I see a pos
mathicgb_1.0~git20150904-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mathicgb_1.0~git20150904-1.dsc
mathicgb_1.0~git20150904.orig.tar.gz
mathicgb_1.0~git20150904-1.debian.tar.xz
libmathicgb-dbg_1.0~git20150904-1_amd64.deb
libmathicgb-dev_1.0~git20150904-1_amd6
46 matches
Mail list logo