[1]Visualiser la version en ligne
[2]Jusqu'à moins 50 pourcent !
[3]Se désabonner
[4]Courrier indésirable
[5][01-Logo-Titre]
[6][02-Homme] [7][03-Femme] [8][04-Garcon] [9][05-Fille]
[10][06-titre]
[11][07-soldes]
[12][08-lien-site]
Hi Anton,
On 2015-01-16 06:35:08, Anton Gladky wrote:
> thanks a lot for the patch and NMU! Feel free to bypass 2-days delay
> and reschedule it to DAYS/0.
you're welcome. I've rescheduled it earlier today.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
debian-s
FYI: The status of the vtk6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 6.1.0+dfsg2-4
Current version: 6.1.0+dfsg2-5
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you wil
Hello all,
I'm sorry if this is the wrong place, but I don't know the what is the
policy for this kind of request...
I would like to suggest to add the "nifti2dicom" and "qnifti2dicom"
packages to some of the debian-science meta-packages (perhaps in
science-neuroscience-cognitive, where there ar
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#774866: fixed in libqglviewer 2.5.3+dfsg-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #774866,
regarding libqglviewer2: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE
to be marked as done.
This mea
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 23:26:55 +0100
Source: libqglviewer
Binary: libqglviewer-dev libqglviewer-doc libqglviewer2
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5.3+dfsg-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Sci
Coucou
Je me nomme Francine Dante j'aimerai faire votre connaissance pour une amitié
sincères basée sur la confiance afin de partager des confidences si cela vous
intéresse veuillez me laissez un message a mon émail privée:
francineda...@gmail.com
Bisous
Au plaisir de vous lire
Francine--
> The problem with these files is that they are listed in
That is a different issue. AFAIK python stuff should be within the
python binary package (python-vtk6), not within the -dev package...
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://li
Hi Anton,
besides this I wonder whether we could / should / are able to get
libvtk6-java back since the removal in #773422 was no solution
everybody is happy about. Did you tried consulting debian-java
list (and if not would you be interested if somebody else would
try?) I'm tempted to reopen th
