Dear Concern,
Some groups of companies joined together and gave me an instruction to kindly
inform you of your first payment of $7,199 USD by Exxon Mobil, Vitol, the
British Prime Minister Mr. David Cameron and the G-20 committee and I will keep
on sending you $7,199 USD until the payment of
Hi,
I was trying to do a first source-only upload, but the package
is rejected. The reason is not clear for me. Could you please
explain, what is wrong?
Thanks
Anton
2014-08-01 23:34 GMT+02:00 Debian FTP Masters :
>
> gnuplot-data_4.6.5-10_all.deb: trying to install to unstable, but could not
gnuplot-data_4.6.5-10_all.deb: trying to install to unstable, but could not
find source
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debia
gnuplot_4.6.5-10_all.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gnuplot_4.6.5-10_all.deb
gnuplot-doc_4.6.5-10_all.deb
gnuplot-tex_4.6.5-10_all.deb
gnuplot-data_4.6.5-10_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
debia
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2014 19:49:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#756803: fixed in spyder 2.3.0+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #756803,
regarding python3-spyderlib: typo in control file: Breakes/Breaks
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 21:24:46 +0200
Source: spyder
Binary: spyder python-spyderlib python-spyderlib-doc spyder3 python3-spyderlib
spyder-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.3.0+dfsg-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: m
spyder_2.3.0+dfsg-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
spyder_2.3.0+dfsg-3.dsc
spyder_2.3.0+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz
spyder_2.3.0+dfsg-3_all.deb
python-spyderlib_2.3.0+dfsg-3_all.deb
python-spyderlib-doc_2.3.0+dfsg-3_all.deb
spyder3_2.3.0+dfsg-3_all.deb
Package: python3-spyderlib
Version: 2.3.0+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
There is a typo in debian/control:
Breakes: ${python3:Breaks},
spyder3 (<< 2.3.0+dfsg-2)
It should be Breaks instead of Breakes.
Cheers,
Felix
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@
severity 756163 minor
thanks
Anton
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 756163 minor
Bug #756163 [gnuplot-qt] [gnuplot-qt] Doesn't provide gnuplot-x11
Severity set to 'minor' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
756163: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
Closing the bug
Anton
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Your message dated Fri, 1 Aug 2014 19:48:01 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Closing the bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #750590,
regarding gnuplot-x11: Crashes with wxt terminal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 1 Aug 2014 19:43:37 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Closing the bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #751441,
regarding gnuplot-x11: Gnuplot terminal wxt no longer in package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Bug is closed.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
On 2014-08-01 18:53:06, Fabien Spindler wrote:
> I was able to deploy a Debian powerpc arch where I tried to reproduce
> without success the error reported during ViSP build.
>
> The test doesn't fail any more. I suspect that a 3rd party was updated. Is
> it possible to restart the build of the pa
FYI: The status of the qcustomplot source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.2.0-1
Current version: 1.2.1-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rec
I was able to deploy a Debian powerpc arch where I tried to reproduce
without success the error reported during ViSP build.
The test doesn't fail any more. I suspect that a 3rd party was updated.
Is it possible to restart the build of the package.
Thanks
Fabien
Le 01/08/14 18:41, Sebastian R
Source: visp
Version: 2.9.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
viisp failed to build on powerpc with:
| Start 90: videoReader
| 90/135 Test #90: videoReader
...***Exception: SegFault
0.34 sec
...
| 99% tes
FYI: The status of the findimagedupes source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.18-4
Current version: 2.18-5
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will re
binary:libdynamicedt3d-dev is NEW.
binary:libdynamicedt3d1.6 is NEW.
binary:libdynamicedt3d1.6-dbg is NEW.
binary:liboctomap-dev is NEW.
binary:liboctomap1.6 is NEW.
binary:liboctomap1.6-dbg is NEW.
binary:liboctovis-dev is NEW.
binary:liboctovis1.6 is NEW.
binary:liboctovis1.6-dbg is NEW.
binary:o
octomap_1.6.6+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
liboctomap1.6_1.6.6+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
octomap-tools_1.6.6+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
liboctomap-dev_1.6.6+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
liboctomap1.6-dbg_1.6.6+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
libdynamicedt3d1.6_1.6.6+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
Hi Andreas,
Sorry, you are right about 2009. I agree with your decision.
We'll see what the response on spdep is before making changes. I
anticipate that bptest is resolved but that soigraph isn't.
I'll start looking at the option of moving spdep/maptools etc. data sets
to a separate package
Hi,
Le 31/07/2014 23:27, Александр Овчинников a écrit :
Hi,
Please see above, Take a look to the message with subject "Update patch". I
have tried to make new patch in the correct way.
sorry, I missed that message with the new patch... indeed the new
version looks better : I'll forward it t
Hi Roger,
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:33:21AM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
> >>What is the r-cran-maptools issue - I'm also the maintainer of that
> >>package? I'm not aware of what might be non-free there; maybe the
> >>data files for examples and testing? Nobody has asked me about that.
> >
> >To e
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Roger,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:42:06PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Given surveillance rather than my (wrong) guess, I'm willing to do
what I can - I agree that actual use in epidemiology is worth
facilitating. Should the soigraph issu
25 matches
Mail list logo