Hi Anton,
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 08:00:14AM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Toby,
>
> as far as I know Andreas Tille proposed a nice and really necessary tool
> to exclude and repack source tarballs [1], [2] (CC-ing him). But, it seems,
> it is not yet in uscan (sorry, I may be wrong).
Files-Ex
Hi Toby,
as far as I know Andreas Tille proposed a nice and really necessary tool
to exclude and repack source tarballs [1], [2] (CC-ing him). But, it seems,
it is not yet in uscan (sorry, I may be wrong).
I would also strongly recommend you to implement autotests using DEP-8 [3].
An example for
tiemu_3.03-nogdb+dfsg-2.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tiemu_3.03-nogdb+dfsg-2.1_amd64.deb
tiemu_3.03-nogdb+dfsg-2.1.dsc
tiemu_3.03-nogdb+dfsg-2.1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 746086 + patch
Bug #746086 [src:tiemu] tiemu: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements
(ticalcs2 >= 1.0.7) were not met
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 746086 + pending
Bug #746086 [src:tiemu] tiemu: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirem
tags 746086 + patch
tags 746086 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for tiemu (versioned as 3.03-nogdb+dfsg-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
--
Regards,
dai
GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 22:52:03 -0400
Source: armadillo
Binary: libarmadillo-dev libarmadillo4
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:4.300.0+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
armadillo_4.300.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libarmadillo-dev_4.300.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
libarmadillo4_4.300.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
armadillo_4.300.0+dfsg-1.dsc
armadillo_4.300.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
armadillo_4.300.0+dfsg-1.diff.gz
Greetings,
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Alteholz writes:
> On Mon, 5 May 2014, Toby St Clere Smithe wrote:
>> I know you have the final say here, but the same document[1], under
>> seciont 6.7.8.2 point 3 makes the converse point that the orig tarball
>> "should, except where impossible for legal reasons, preserve
Hi Anton,
further to the discussion earlier, over the next days I'm going to
collect together a couple of bug fixes, make a new upstream release, and
also do the repackaging. Then would you be happy to sponsor a new
upload?
Also, I would still like to learn more about this new tool that you and
T
Hi all:
I would like to ask for sponsoring on a new package, fcl. Leo started
the work and I'm finishing the packaging.
Description, in fcl project own words:
"""
FCL is a collision and proximity library that integrates several
techniques for fast and accurate collision checking and proximity
com
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:31:51 +
Source: pyviennacl
Binary: python-pyviennacl python3-pyviennacl pyviennacl-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Scie
Hi Toby,
On Mon, 5 May 2014, Toby St Clere Smithe wrote:
I know you have the final say here, but the same document[1], under
seciont 6.7.8.2 point 3 makes the converse point that the orig tarball
"should, except where impossible for legal reasons, preserve the entire
building and portablility in
Hi Anton,
Anton Gladky writes:
> 2014-05-05 21:18 GMT+02:00 Toby St Clere Smithe :
>> But, of course, if you think it is imperative that they are removed,
>> then I shall do so!
>
> Ok, I would agree then with Thorsten. Especially, when we get this new tool
> (debian/copyright) this process will
2014-05-05 21:18 GMT+02:00 Toby St Clere Smithe :
> But, of course, if you think it is imperative that they are removed,
> then I shall do so!
Ok, I would agree then with Thorsten. Especially, when we get this new tool
(debian/copyright) this process will be much easier.
Thorsten, could you pleas
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Alteholz writes:
> On Mon, 5 May 2014, Toby St Clere Smithe wrote:
>> Since the source package is built directly from these upstream sources
>> (no need to repackage, because the copyright situation is OK),
>
> but in [1] there are other reasons mentioned to repackage.
> Rem
Hi Toby,
On Mon, 5 May 2014, Toby St Clere Smithe wrote:
Since the source package is built directly from these upstream sources
(no need to repackage, because the copyright situation is OK),
but in [1] there are other reasons mentioned to repackage.
Removing 4200 files out of 4300 seems to be
Source: getdp
Version: 2.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: sriva...@debian.org
Usertags: transition-make-4.0
Tags: patch
Hi,
your package no longer builds from source due to a bug in debian/rules
that gets triggered with m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 731823 -1
Bug #731823 [libvtk-java] major version 51 is newer than 50, the highest major
version supported by this compiler.
Bug 731823 cloned as bug 747108
> reassign -1 libvtk6-java
Bug #747108 [libvtk-java] major version 51 is newer than
FYI: The status of the clasp source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.0.3-1
Current version: 3.0.4-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
l
Your message dated Mon, 05 May 2014 15:48:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#730869: fixed in python-pywcs 1.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #730869,
regarding Please upgrade python-pywcs from 1.11 to 1.10.1 or better
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 15:09:02 +0200
Source: python-pywcs
Binary: python-pywcs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Changed-By: Ole Streicher
python-pywcs_1.12-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-pywcs_1.12-1_amd64.deb
python-pywcs_1.12-1.dsc
python-pywcs_1.12.orig.tar.gz
python-pywcs_1.12-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 746493 libjogl2-java
Bug #746493 [scilab] scilab: scilab fails to launch on powerpc
Bug reassigned from package 'scilab' to 'libjogl2-java'.
No longer marked as found in versions scilab/5.5.0-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of
Hi Thorsten,
(I lost power on my laptop, so lost your e-mail and have to reply like
this..)
If you have a look at debian/rules, you'll see that in fact I do use the
Debian-provided Boost. And there is a good reason why the source package
contains a subset of Boost: PyViennaCL is written for a gen
Your message dated Mon, 05 May 2014 14:15:18 +0200
with message-id <536780d6.5060...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#746772: dune-grid: FTBFS on mipsel
has caused the Debian Bug report #746772,
regarding dune-grid: FTBFS on mipsel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
On 05/03/2014 14:11, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> The binnmu of dune-grid on mipsel failed twice:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=dune-grid&arch=mipsel
mayer.debian.org has only 1 GB RAM (+ 0.5 GB swap), but is configured to
build in parallel with 2 processes. dune-grid however needs
You can boost downloads of your app by joining the exclusive club of the 40%...
How To Boost The Number of Installs of Your Digital Magazine Mobile App
http://blog.presspadapp.com/boost-number-installs-digital-magazine-mobile-app
===
Dear Maintainer,
is there a reason that most of your package contains of a copy of Boost?
Couldn't you use the version already in the archive?
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailma
Your message dated Mon, 05 May 2014 10:35:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#735807: fixed in salome-kernel 6.5.0-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #735807,
regarding salome-kernel: FTBFS: FATAL ERROR: some mandatory products are missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Mapping sid to unstable.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 11:18:21 +0200
Source: salome-kernel
Binary: salome-kernel salome-kernel-dev salome-kernel-doc salome-kernel-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 6.5.0-8
Distribution: sid
U
salome-kernel_6.5.0-8_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
salome-kernel_6.5.0-8_amd64.deb
salome-kernel-dev_6.5.0-8_amd64.deb
salome-kernel-dbg_6.5.0-8_amd64.deb
salome-kernel-doc_6.5.0-8_all.deb
salome-kernel_6.5.0-8.dsc
salome-kernel_6.5.0-8.diff.gz
salome-kernel_6.5.0-8_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
salome-kernel_6.5.0-8_amd64.deb
salome-kernel-dev_6.5.0-8_amd64.deb
salome-kernel-dbg_6.5.0-8_amd64.deb
salome-kernel-doc_6.5.0-8_all.deb
salome-kernel_6.5.0-8.dsc
salome-kernel_6.5
32 matches
Mail list logo
