On 4/1/14, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On March 31, 2014 10:58:28 AM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Package: libvtk6
>>
>> Clearly there is something missing here. libvtk6 can be co-installed
>> with libvtk5.8. VTK API (ABI too) is completely incompatible in
>> between those two versions.
>
> Clearly I
vtk6 6.0.0-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-04-16
It is affected by these RC bugs:
741927: vtk6: The imported target "vtkWrapTcl" references the file
741928: vtk6: /usr/lib/cmake/vtk-6.0/vtkMakeInstantiator.cmake
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintain
On March 31, 2014 10:58:28 AM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Package: libvtk6
>
> Clearly there is something missing here. libvtk6 can be co-installed
> with libvtk5.8. VTK API (ABI too) is completely incompatible in
> between those two versions.
Clearly I'm missing something, because it is routine t
Your message dated Tue, 01 Apr 2014 01:48:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#719485: fixed in inventor 2.1.5-10-18
has caused the Debian Bug report #719485,
regarding [inventor] please explicitly link Decal.so against libc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 01 Apr 2014 01:48:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#739186: fixed in inventor 2.1.5-10-18
has caused the Debian Bug report #739186,
regarding inventor: FTBFS on s390x: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses
precision [-fpermissive]
to be marked as done.
This
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:20:06 -0500
Source: inventor
Binary: libinventor1 inventor-dev inventor-doc inventor-clients inventor-data
inventor-demo
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.1.5-10-18
Distribution: unstable
Urge
inventor_2.1.5-10-18_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
inventor_2.1.5-10-18.dsc
inventor_2.1.5-10-18.debian.tar.xz
inventor-doc_2.1.5-10-18_all.deb
inventor-data_2.1.5-10-18_all.deb
libinventor1_2.1.5-10-18_amd64.deb
inventor-dev_2.1.5-10-18_amd64.de
Package: gnuplot
Version: 4.6.4-1~bpo70+1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When running a "call" command with arguments, if the called file runs a "load"
command, then the arguments are destroyed.
For example, if there are three files in the current directory:
experiment.plot:
set samples 100
Am 31.03.2014 19:50, schrieb Steven Chamberlain:
tags 743131 + patch jessie sid
clone 743131 -1
reassign -1 src:eclipse-cdt
found -1 eclipse-cdt/8.3.0-1
thanks
Hi,
On 31/03/14 17:49, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Therefore, would that be an acceptable course of action for you if I
restrict the arc
binary:liburdfdom-model-state0.3 is NEW.
binary:liburdfdom0.3-dbg is NEW.
binary:liburdfdom-model0.3 is NEW.
binary:liburdfdom-sensor0.3 is NEW.
binary:liburdfdom-world0.3 is NEW.
Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file. It is ok otherwise, so pleas
urdfdom_0.3.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
urdfdom_0.3.0-1.dsc
urdfdom_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz
urdfdom_0.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
liburdfdom-model0.3_0.3.0-1_amd64.deb
liburdfdom-model-state0.3_0.3.0-1_amd64.deb
liburdfdom-sensor0.3_0.3.0-1_amd64.deb
l
tags 743131 + patch jessie sid
clone 743131 -1
reassign -1 src:eclipse-cdt
found -1 eclipse-cdt/8.3.0-1
thanks
Hi,
On 31/03/14 17:49, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Therefore, would that be an acceptable course of action for you if I
> restrict the architecture set of glpk-java to those were the def
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 743131 + patch jessie sid
Bug #743131 [glpk-java] FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk
Added tag(s) sid, jessie, and patch.
> clone 743131 -1
Bug #743131 [glpk-java] FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk
Bug 743131 cloned as bug 743234
> reassign -1 src
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:14:43 +
Source: urdfdom-headers
Binary: liburdfdom-headers-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Changed-By:
urdfdom-headers_0.3.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
urdfdom-headers_0.3.0-1.dsc
urdfdom-headers_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz
urdfdom-headers_0.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
liburdfdom-headers-dev_0.3.0-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on
On 03/31/2014 07:07 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi,
> 2014-03-26 22:18 GMT+01:00 Jose Luis Rivero :
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/urdfdom.git
>
> Please, push pristine-tar branch.
Sorry, done.
> Why do you use dfsg-prefix?
Just to remove some metadata from git a
Hi Mathieu,
thanks for bugreport. We should probably discuss how to
proceed with this transition. From my point of view it is
better to do as quickly as possible. Declaring 5.8 and 6.0
version is possible, but during transition time we will get
tons of removed packages. What do you think?
Anton
Hi,
2014-03-26 22:18 GMT+01:00 Jose Luis Rivero :
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/urdfdom.git
Please, push pristine-tar branch. Why do you use dfsg-prefix? It seems,
there is nothing critical in removed files. IMHO you can just let them be,
if you want and drop dfsg-p
Le dimanche 30 mars 2014 à 22:08 +0100, Steven Chamberlain a écrit :
> On 30/03/14 19:53, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > Maybe glpk-java should have a more specific build-dependency on
> > openjdk-7-jdk instead of default-jdk. Then it builds fine.
>
> This is apparently not allowed by Debian Java
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:49:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#736054: fixed in yorick-yeti 6.3.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #736054,
regarding please build-depend on libtiff-dev, not libtiff4-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:16:53 +0200
Source: yorick-yeti
Binary: yorick-yeti yorick-yeti-tiff yorick-yeti-regex yorick-yeti-fftw
yorick-yeti-gsl
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 6.3.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency
yorick-yeti_6.3.3-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
yorick-yeti_6.3.3-2.dsc
yorick-yeti_6.3.3-2.debian.tar.xz
yorick-yeti_6.3.3-2_amd64.deb
yorick-yeti-tiff_6.3.3-2_amd64.deb
yorick-yeti-regex_6.3.3-2_amd64.deb
yorick-yeti-fftw_6.3.3-2_amd64.deb
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:22:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#741818: fixed in tkgate 2.0~b10-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #741818,
regarding tkgate: FTBFS: block.c:1103:20: error: 'Tcl_Interp' has no member
named 'result'
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:12:59 +0200
with message-id <533985fb.9020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: gyoto: FTBFS with binutils-gold
has caused the Debian Bug report #682956,
regarding gyoto: FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
My dear I sent you an important information that required urgent your
action but until now you have not reply the message why?
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-mainta
Vous recevez cet email car vous êtes inscrit à la base M.E.S.
Si le message ci-dessous ne s'affiche pas correctement, vous pouvez consulter
la version en ligne.
[http://s1.emailing-factory.fr/static/n/ndLuuhNIkwEacmL5pi8DgM6U/c/xlsd66a225fca6e484ca46dca58db]
[http://s1.emailing-fac
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:14:49 +0200
Source: yp-svipc
Binary: yorick-svipc python-svipc python3-svipc
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Ch
yp-svipc_0.15-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
yp-svipc_0.15-1.dsc
yp-svipc_0.15.orig.tar.gz
yp-svipc_0.15-1.debian.tar.xz
yorick-svipc_0.15-1_amd64.deb
python-svipc_0.15-1_amd64.deb
python3-svipc_0.15-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:43:59 +0200
Source: yorick-ygsl
Binary: yorick-ygsl
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Changed-By: Thibaut Pau
yorick-ygsl_1.1.1-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
yorick-ygsl_1.1.1-3.dsc
yorick-ygsl_1.1.1-3.debian.tar.xz
yorick-ygsl_1.1.1-3_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
debian-science-maintainers
Hi,
I'm thinking to package another piece of software under about robotics. When I
have login to alioth and chdir to /git/debian-science/packages I have realised
that:
$ ls -1 | grep .git | wc -l
425
so, we have 425 folders containing 425 git repos.
I thought that the packages from robotics
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:00:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#742941: fixed in mpich 3.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #742941,
regarding conflict with libmpich10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:07:29 +0100
Source: mpich
Binary: libmpich-dev libmpich12 libmpich2-dev mpich mpich-doc mpich2 mpich2-doc
libmpl-dev libmpl1 libopa-dev libopa1
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 3.1-3
Distributi
Hi,
The new upstream version (0.14) will include a "debian-friendly" source
tree which includes test images (this makes the source package > 100MB)
and exclude all auto-generated files like from cython, sphinx, pylint,
epydoc, ... to keep it compatible with debian rules.
Once upon a time I read u
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 743177 grave
Bug #743177 [libvtk6] libvtk6 should conflicts with libvtk5.8
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
743177: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Package: libvtk6
Clearly there is something missing here. libvtk6 can be co-installed
with libvtk5.8. VTK API (ABI too) is completely incompatible in
between those two versions.
Typical scenarios that should not happen is an app linked against
vtkCommon and vtkCommonCore. This gets even worst wit
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 upstream
Bug #743080 [src:cpl-plugin-kmos] cpl-plugin-kmos: FTBFS: Tests failures
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded -1 PIPE-5106
Bug #743080 [src:cpl-plugin-kmos] cpl-plugin-kmos: FTBFS: Tests failures
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'PIPE-5106'.
--
743080:
Control: tag -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 PIPE-5106
The bug was forwarded to upstream and is registered under the mentioned
Id. Since the bug database is not public, an URL is not given.
It is not clear whether the problem belongs to cpl-plugin-kmos or to
cpl-6.4.1.
--
debian-science-maint
38 matches
Mail list logo
