On Friday 14 March 2014 11:56:56 Olly Betts wrote:
> I'm happy to NMU this change if you wish me to - just let me know.
That would be great!
Cheers
Frank
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lis
Package: qtiplot
Version: 0.9.8.8-5+b1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
starting from Wheezy, qtiplot gives wrong fit results when using the
Fit Wizard.
Here is my dataset (which I use to test qtiplot since 2007):
x_iy_is_is_i: error of y_i (standard deviation)
--
2014-03-14 15:22 GMT+01:00 Jose Luis Rivero :
> Should I set a different value by default?
I set it to "medium" and uploaded.
> If ode is going to use libccd and libccd is an independent project, ode
> should not be embedded a copy of libccd without a very good reason. AFAIK,
> the recommended wa
Hi Steffen,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
According to your debian/copyright the license of this software is GPLv2+.
I really found a file with that license, but most of the files are LGPL3+
or something else ...
Can you please check the copyright of the files in doc/? Some Tim
Dear Maintainer,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please upgrade the GPL-3 entry in debian/copyright to GPL-3+ and add
all missing licenses of files in docs/
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or i
binary:libccd2-dbg is NEW.
binary:libccd2 is NEW.
binary:libccd-dev is NEW.
source:libccd is NEW.
Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a we
libccd_1.5-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libccd_1.5-1.dsc
libccd_1.5.orig.tar.gz
libccd_1.5-1.debian.tar.xz
libccd2_1.5-1_amd64.deb
libccd-dev_1.5-1_amd64.deb
libccd2-dbg_1.5-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on
Hey Leo:
On 03/14/2014 08:59 AM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
A Dijous, 13 de març de 2014, Anton Gladky va escriure:
Hi Jose,
as I understand, you will maintain this package under
Debian-Science team? If so, please, change debian/control
accordingly. Also it would be good, if the package
On 03/13/2014 08:17 PM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
Hello,
what is the advantage compare to bullet [1].
I can not answer to this directly but I've forwarded your question to
our physics team at the OSRF and will let you know as soon as I have the
details.
Did they plan to add algorithm
On 03/13/2014 07:46 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi Jose,
as I understand, you will maintain this package under
Debian-Science team? If so, please, change debian/control
accordingly.
Done.
Also it would be good, if the package will be
multiarched.
Done, with the proper report to upstream with t
Processing control commands:
> clone 741568 -2
Bug #741568 [libcurl4-gnutls-dev] lack of symbol versioning and gnutls mismatch
results in problem
Bug 741568 cloned as bug 741607
741607 was not blocked by any bugs.
741607 was blocking: 741557
Added blocking bug(s) of 741607: 741557
> reassign -2 g
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:15:46 +0100
Source: ompl
Binary: libompl-dev libompl9 ompl-demos libompl9-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.14.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Package: ompl
Version: 0.14.1-1
Severity: serious
User: alteh...@debian.org
Usertags: ftp
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
thanks
Dear Maintainer,
please add the missing licenses of
ompl-0.14.1-Source\doc\css\bootstrap-responsive.css
ompl-0.14.1-Source\doc\css\bootstrap.css
ompl-
Calculez le risque de vous faire cambrioler
Vous recevez cet email car vous êtes inscrit à la base M.E.S.
Si le message ci-dessous ne s'affiche pas correctement, vous pouvez consulter
la version en ligne.
[http://s1.emailing-factory.fr/static/n/nG0tVIXR32j6iKd3rdUcsByK/c/xlsd66a225fca6e484
Si vous ne parvenez pas lire cet email, vous pouvez le visualiser,
http://tr1.bp42.net/r5.aspx?GV1=LISA0304KY0004ZQ8001YMP0J&mpvrs=618400D43927F
en cliquant sur ce lien.
http://tr1.bp42.net/r5.aspx?GV1=LISA0304KY0004ZPX001YMP0J&mpvrs=618400D43927F
http://tr1.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 741303 1:0.97.0-beta.1-1
Bug #741303 [libfeel++1] libfeel++1: libfeelpp.so.1.0.0 links with both
GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries
Marked as found in versions feel++/1:0.97.0-beta.1-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:30:35 +
Source: feel++
Binary: libfeel++1 libfeel++-dev libfeel++-dbg feel++-apps feel++-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1:0.97.0-final-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintain
feel++_0.97.0-final-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
feel++_0.97.0-final-1.dsc
feel++_0.97.0-final.orig.tar.gz
feel++_0.97.0-final-1.debian.tar.xz
feel++-doc_0.97.0-final-1_all.deb
libfeel++1_0.97.0-final-1_amd64.deb
libfeel++-dev_0.97.0-final-1_a
A Dijous, 13 de març de 2014, Anton Gladky va escriure:
> Hi Jose,
>
> as I understand, you will maintain this package under
> Debian-Science team? If so, please, change debian/control
> accordingly. Also it would be good, if the package will be
> multiarched.
Hi Jose,
I agree with Anton about t
19 matches
Mail list logo
