Re: Bug#1099935: dnspython: autopkgtest regression on s390x: bad request

2025-03-16 Thread Pranav P
this results in a bad request. I am not able to see the same issue on ls-qpack though. I will update any new findings. Thanks, Pranav From: Pranav P Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 10:11 AM To: sub...@bugs.debian.org ; Paul Gevers ; 1099...@bugs.debian.org <1

RE: Bug#1099935: dnspython: autopkgtest regression on s390x: bad request

2025-03-20 Thread Pranav P
Hi Colin, Thanks a lot. I raised an issue with a suggested fix on pylsqpack's github repo and has asked them how they want to integrate the changes. I will also raise a PR to ls-qpack's repo. Meanwhile, I am attaching the patch with a commit message generated via quilt. I am new to the communit

RE: Bug#1099935: dnspython: autopkgtest regression on s390x: bad request

2025-03-19 Thread Pranav P
pack is compiling without passing any -std flags which defaults to gnu standards). Thank you From: Colin Watson Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 12:11 AM To: Pranav P ; 1099...@bugs.debian.org <1099...@bugs.debian.org> Cc: Paul Gevers ; debian-s390@lis

RE: Bug#1101187: RM: denemo [s390x] -- RoQA; fails autokpgtest

2025-04-09 Thread Pranav P
Hi Bastian, I found the fix for the stack smash. I sent to denemo's official maintainer and that patch is also merged with upstream repository. I will link the commit and bug report. https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=67002#options https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/denemo.git

RE: Bug#1101187: RM: denemo [s390x] -- RoQA; fails autokpgtest

2025-04-08 Thread Pranav P
Hi Bastian, The patch got merged to upstream. I am posting the link here https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/denemo.git/commit/?id=a1c52e0ef12666361ef5b737a7367b84e27fab9c Thanks, Pranav From: Pranav P Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2025 10:18 AM To: Debian Bug Tracking

Re: Bug#1101187: RM: denemo [s390x] -- RoQA; fails autokpgtest

2025-04-08 Thread Pranav P
Hi Bastian, It looks like a (size_t*) casting an int variable was causing some problems. This resulted in the output filenames to be empty strings and outputs were not being written. Fixing that seems to fix the issue when building from source. But when doing 'sbuild' I encounter a 'stack smash

RE: git ftbfs on s390x (test failures)

2025-04-20 Thread Pranav P
Hi, I was able to reproduce the issue. I will update all of my findings in the mailing list. Thanks, Pranav From: Bastian Blank Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2025 4:45 PM To: debian-s390 ; 1102...@bugs.debian.org <1102...@bugs.debian.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: git

RE: git ftbfs on s390x (test failures)

2025-04-22 Thread Pranav P
So, I was checking if there is any evidence that indicates a potential range for min_batch_size. I was also planning to ping with the upstream community for clarification. Thanks, Pranav From: Pranav P Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 10:08 AM To: Bastian Blank ; de

RE: git ftbfs on s390x (test failures)

2025-04-22 Thread Pranav P
Hi, I had written to the community. Seems like they already have a more versatile fix. The fix has already been merged to `next`. I am providing the reply I received. https://lore.kernel.org/git/aaefbu-mmy_73...@pks.im/ Thanks, Pranav From: Pranav P

RE: Bug#1103593: python-djvulibre: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2025-04-27 Thread Pranav P
Thanks a lot Colin From: Colin Watson Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 5:05 AM To: Pranav P; 1103...@bugs.debian.org Cc: Chris Hofstaedtler; debian-s390 Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Bug#1103593: python-djvulibre: autopkgtest regression on s390x On Wed, Apr 23

Re: Bug#1103593: python-djvulibre: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2025-04-23 Thread Pranav P
Hi Chris, Thanks for reporting this and I would love to look into this. I am actually working on a few other bugs as well. I will try to check this one in parallel. Please give me some time. Thanks, Pranav From: Chris Hofstaedtler Sent: Saturday, April 1

Re: Autopkgtest not working in s390x architecture (Was: Bug#1103286: RM: nanostat [s390x] -- ROM; Should not be provided on s390x architecture)

2025-04-16 Thread Pranav P
Hi Andreas, Thanks for updating. And also, I am very grateful for your suggestion. Thanks, Pranav From: Andreas Tille Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2025 10:17 AM To: 1103...@bugs.debian.org <1103...@bugs.debian.org> Cc: debian-s390 ; Thorsten Alteholz Subject: [EXT

Re: Bug#1102693: src:frr: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2025-04-15 Thread Pranav P
Hi, Looks like https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/18662/commits/da8fce3830baa2fd4d70050a3f7677d6e8bd5ad4 by Mark is fixing the issue. But it's still waiting to be merged. Thanks, Pranav

RE: Bug#1101694: gjs: test failures on big-endian

2025-05-06 Thread Pranav P
Hi Jeremy, Sorry to hear that. I will have to come up with a fix for the `Regress` test failure also. Thanks, Pranav From: Jeremy Bícha Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 4:01 AM To: Pranav P Cc: Berli Gayathri; 1101...@bugs.debian.org; debian-s390 Subject

RE: Bug#1101694: gjs: test failures on big-endian

2025-05-02 Thread Pranav P
Hi Jeremy, It seems like when `simple_setters_caller` calls `simple_setter_caller` this function calls `gi_marshalling_tests_properties_accessors_object_set_flags` with `arg->v_pointer` as the `some_flags` where `some_flags` is an `enum` and arg->v_pointer is of `void*` (Actually it's a gpoint

Re: Bug#1099637: RM: python-mapnik [s390x] -- ROM; FTBFS

2025-03-11 Thread Pranav P
Hi Bas, Thanks for reporting this. I will look into the issue and see what can be done. Kind Regards, Pranav From: Bas Couwenberg Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 9:44 AM To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: [EXTERNAL] Bug#1099637: RM: python-mapnik [s390x] --

RE: Bug#1098270: trimesh: Build fails on s390x due to math errors in autopkgtest

2025-02-26 Thread Pranav P
Hi Gregor, Thanks for the update. I am able to successfully build the package on s390x machine with the latest patch applied. Thank you very much, Pranav P From: Gregor Riepl Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2025 3:37 PM To: 1098...@bugs.debian.org <1

RE: Bug#1099935: dnspython: autopkgtest regression on s390x: bad request

2025-03-20 Thread Pranav P
I am extremely sorry. I raised the PR in ls-qpack's repo at https://github.com/litespeedtech/ls-qpack/pull/76 Thanks Pranav From: Colin Watson Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2025 6:19 PM To: Pranav P Cc: 1099935 <1099...@bugs.debian.org>; elbrus ;

RE: Bug#1101694: gjs: test failures on big-endian

2025-05-09 Thread Pranav P
Hi Jeremy, I have submitted a merge request for the Regress test at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection-tests/-/merge_requests/18 Thanks, Pranav From: Jeremy Bícha Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 4:01 AM To: Pranav P Cc: Berli Gayathri; 1101

RE: Bug#1103423: src:kitty: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2025-05-19 Thread Pranav P
Hi, I had some updates regarding kitty. While going through one of the errors, there was this one `union` called `CPUCell` defined as ``` > typedef union CPUCell { > struct { > char_type ch_or_idx: sizeof(char_type) * 8 - 1; > char_type ch_is_idx: 1; > char_type hype

Re: Bug#1106096: austinp only produces invalid frames on s390x

2025-05-27 Thread Pranav P
Hi Helmut, In the github issue it was mentioned that this is also failing on `armhf`. Can you please confirm whether these were the same issues? Meanwhile I am also checking the code. I will update you if I find something. Thanks, Pranav From: Helmut Groh

RE: Bug#1103423: src:kitty: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2025-05-21 Thread Pranav P
Hi, This is the PR that was raised for this issue. https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty/pull/8668 Thanks, Pranav From: Pranav P Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 11:06 AM To: elbrus; 1103...@bugs.debian.org; Nilesh Patra; debian-s390 Cc: 1103

Re: pyacoustid: Enabling test cases for s390x after fix for test failures

2025-06-01 Thread Pranav P
Hi, I assume the upstream maintainer is not maintaining pyacoustid any longer. Seems like the last commit was made in 2023. Thanks, Pranav From: Pranav P Sent: Monday, June 2, 2025 12:27 AM To: Debian Bug Tracking System; Chris Hofstaedtler Cc: Jeremy

Re: Bug#1107081: RM: pgpool2, libpgpool2, libpgpool-dev, postgresql-17-pgpool2 [s390x] -- ROM; no longer supported on big-endian

2025-06-01 Thread Pranav P
Hi Christoph, I am from IBM and was just going through the github issue which was raised in regards to this. I would love to take a look at the issue. If I can find anything I will update. Thanks, Pranav From: Christoph Berg Sent: Sunday, June 1, 2025

pyacoustid: Enabling test cases for s390x after fix for test failures

2025-06-01 Thread Pranav P
Source: pyacoustid Version: 1.3.0-2 Severity: important Hi, The PR https://github.com/beetbox/pyacoustid/pull/88 should fix the bug reported in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093700 I hope the tests can be re-enabled on s390x now. Thanks, Pranav

Re: enchant-2: build tests fail on s390x

2025-05-31 Thread Pranav P
Hi, I found a fix for the issue and has raised a PR for the same at https://github.com/rrthomas/enchant/pull/417 Looks like `valac` needs to be added to `Build-Depends` within the `debian/control` file. Thanks, Pranav

RE: Bug#1107192: s390-tools: after upgrade from bookworm to trixie no network

2025-06-15 Thread Pranav P
Hi Paul, The issue is fixed with this bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1107690. So hope we can close #1107192 as well. Thanks, Pranav

RE: Bug#1107081: RM: pgpool2, libpgpool2, libpgpool-dev, postgresql-17-pgpool2 [s390x] -- ROM; no longer supported on big-endian

2025-06-18 Thread Pranav P
Hi Christoph, I am still looking into this one. Unfortunately outside of sbuild, I am not able to reproduce this issue. When I ran `./regress.sh 005.jdbc` the test is passing. But when run in sbuild, I am getting the error. I am not sure if I missed any flags or configuration. But due to this I

RE: Bug#1107192: s390-tools: after upgrade from bookworm to trixie no network

2025-06-06 Thread Pranav P
Hi Paul, Thanks a lot! I will also tinker around on this and will update if I find anything interesting. And yes, the 3270 console is a bit of a headache for me as well :) (Although, I use the c3270 emulator so that I don't have to suffer the extra headache caused by the X11 port forwarding th

Re: Bug#1107192: s390-tools: after upgrade from bookworm to trixie no network

2025-06-06 Thread Pranav P
Hi Paul, So sorry for the late reply. After an upgrade which triggered `update-initramfs`, I was also having the issue where the system fails to detect the rootfs and would boot into the initramfs busybox. After reinstalling bookworm, I updated the sources.list to use unstable and then did a di

RE: Bug#1107192: s390-tools: after upgrade from bookworm to trixie no network

2025-06-08 Thread Pranav P
Hi Paul, Thanks for replying. But I assume there are still some issues that need to be fixed. When I install bookworm in an FCP device and then make an upgrade to trixie it is still failing to detect the rootfs. I tried installing bookworm on a DASD device and tried upgrading to trixie and that

RE: Bug#1107192: s390-tools: after upgrade from bookworm to trixie no network

2025-06-10 Thread Pranav P
Hi Paul, I think the latest version of `initramfs-tools` is causing the problem. I was able to reproduce the same issue only by upgrading `initramfs-tools` without the dist-upgrade. With this knowledge I chrooted into my failing trixie installation, downgraded initramfs-tools to the version that

Re: Bug#1107477: assimp: autopkgtest uses incredible amount of memory on s390x

2025-07-15 Thread Pranav P
Hi Paul, It looks like this memory usage is surging when running `assimp info` on FBX files. I am able to reproduce the issue in the upstream source code using: `assimp info /assimp/test/models/FBX/animation_with_skeleton.fbx 2>&1` I will try to dig deeper and will update if I can find somethin

RE: Bug#1107451: src:lomiri-mediaplayer-app: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2025-07-14 Thread Pranav P
Hi Mike, hi Paul, Sure. Thanks a lot.

Re: S390x maintainer on debian

2025-07-17 Thread Pranav P
Hi Kiruthika, We, LoZ at IBM, along with the community are actively participating in maintaining Debian on s390x. I will be representing on behalf of IBM. Feel free to contact me. Regards, Pranav

Re: Bug#1108813: RM: deskflow [s390x] -- ANAIS

2025-07-08 Thread Pranav P
Hi Kentaro, I was looking into this bug for some time. Looks very much like classical endianness issues. I will update if I find anything. Thanks, Pranav

Bug#1107451: src:lomiri-mediaplayer-app: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2025-07-11 Thread Pranav P
Hi Paul, The build logs in https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lomiri-mediaplayer-app&arch=s390x&ver=1.1.1%2Bdfsg-3&stamp=1749682694&raw=0 is indicating that the unit test `video_player` does pass. I tried building the package from source using cmake and ran ctest on my s390x machine

RE: Bug#1107081: RM: pgpool2, libpgpool2, libpgpool-dev, postgresql-17-pgpool2 [s390x] -- ROM; no longer supported on big-endian

2025-06-29 Thread Pranav P
Hi Christoph, Thanks to Tatsuo Ishii (is...@postgresql.org) we have a fix for the issue. I tried with the following patch and it does seem to fix the issue. ``` diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 881966fbc..bd8283090 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ dnl

RE: Bug#1107477: assimp: autopkgtest uses incredible amount of memory on s390x

2025-07-23 Thread Pranav P
Hi Paul, With this PR (https://github.com/assimp/assimp/pull/6277) the issue should be fixed. Thanks, Pranav

Re: Bug#1107330: openbabel: autopkgtest uses incredible amount of memory on s390x

2025-07-28 Thread Pranav P
Hi Paul, I was currently looking into this package. In line no. 166 of getinchi.cpp there is a while loop that goes like the following: while((ch=is.get())!=EOF) Here ch is of type char. Whether char is signed or unsigned depends on the implementation. Looks like in s390x char is of unsigned n

RE: Bug#1107330: openbabel: autopkgtest uses incredible amount of memory on s390x

2025-07-28 Thread Pranav P
Hi Paul, Sorry. I had typed in `unsigned char` in the previous mail instead of `signed char`. The following is the git diff. diff --git a/src/formats/getinchi.cpp b/src/formats/getinchi.cpp index abda0a244..58c53cdac 100644 --- a/src/formats/getinchi.cpp +++ b/src/formats/getinchi.cpp @@ -159,7