Hi,
On 10-09-16 00:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - fpc not available on powerpc anymore (may have changed recently)
For whatever it is worth, this was finally fixed this week. It is
missing on mips*, ppc64el and s390x though, while at least some form of
MIPS is supported upstream.
Paul
signatu
Hi,
Results of autopkgtests in Debian packages are used to influence package
migration from unstable to testing. I recently started to expand the
amount of architectures that ci.debian.net is covering. We currently
have amd64, arm64, armhf, i386 and ppc64el. I have good hopes that we
can expand th
Hi all,
Today I stumbled upon some packages that failed to migrate to testing
because they switched their build dependency to qt6-declarative. It
seems to me that this package is relatively new and a replacement for
something we already had for a while. Apparently that built on s390x, so
this
Hi,
On 18-04-2022 21:38, Patrick Franz wrote:
this build failure is fixed in version 6.2.4+dfsg-4 of qt6-declarative
(https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=qt6-declarative&suite=experimental).
Awesome. Sorry for not spotting that myself.
The package is currently in experimental, bec
Dear s390x porters,
As a Release Manager, I'm asking your help with the FTBFS of vkd3d on
s390x. The failure is blocking migration of the key package vkd3d.
Paul
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:54:51 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between te
Hi,
[tl;dr: atop seems to hang on s390x]
On 12-08-2022 12:23, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:51:32PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 10-08-2022 12:03, Marc Haber wrote:
Unfortunately, this bug report suffers from multiple cut&paste or
template error. The ci link points to
Hi,
On 13-08-2022 21:34, Marc Haber wrote:
running atop from unstable also hangs:
root@elbrus:~# atop
^C
on zelenka, running the atop binary just works fine. Installing atop
2.7.1-2 in a DD chroot on zelenka also works fine, and the binary is ok
as well. However, the chroots dont start the ser
Hi Michael
On 29-08-2022 14:23, Michael Biebl wrote:
As you are probably aware, this issue is known and tracked in [1].
Which I added as a blocker and mentioned in my message, so yes.
The
package FTBFS after enabling the test suite. I raised this issue
upstream but there is no real interest
pak
*From: *Dipak Zope1
*Date: *Tuesday, 30 August 2022 at 3:28 PM
*To: *Paul Gevers , 1018...@bugs.debian.org
<1018...@bugs.debian.org>, debian-s390
*Subject: *[EXTERNAL] RE: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for
too long: FTBFS on s390x
Apologies for late response. It looks l
but had the other bug in
mind (in atop).
I am looking forward to have a fix for this for s390x.
Can you still look into the exempi issue in this bug report?
On 30/08/22, 12:44 AM, "Paul Gevers" wrote:
Hi Michael
On 29-08-2022 14:23, Michael Biebl wrote:
> As you are probabl
Dear all,
This is a call for help, mostly for s390x specifically and debugging our
s390x host,
ci.debian.net is the infrastructure that enables the Debian Release Team
to run autopkgtest as part of the quality assurance for
unstable-to-testing migration. Historically, that used to be exclusi
Hi Phil and all others offering help,
On 12-02-2023 20:32, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 11.02.23 18:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
* [suspect 1] network issues between the s390x and the main ci.d.n
server (the results (log files) of the autopkgtests are transferred to
the main server). Our ppc64el hosts
Hi Phil,
On 13-02-2023 08:57, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 12.02.23 22:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
I have munin [1], but as said, I'm not a trained sysadmin. I don't
know what I'm looking for if you ask "statistics on the network".
This is more of a software development
Hi,
On 13-02-2023 15:59, Dipak Zope1 wrote:
There is some issue with 5.10.0-21 kernel and we are working on it. This
can cause performance impact on CI servers.
I have rebooted to the old kernel yesterday. That helps a bit indeed,
although most of the issues I reported predate that kernel upg
Hi,
On 21-02-2023 17:46, Dipak Zope1 wrote:
I am wondering whether we have downgraded the machines to 5.10.0-20
kernel to get rid of the kernel bug.
I think I mentioned it before, we downgraded indeed:
root@ci-worker-s390x-01:~# uname -a
Linux ci-worker-s390x-01 5.10.0-20-s390x #1 SMP Debian 5
Hi,
On 28-02-2023 01:39, James Addison wrote:
Attempting to sum together what look, to me, like a pair of 2s:
* The s390x Debian CI queue size[1] is growing again.
Yes, but this time it's because some test seems to be misbehaving (only
on s390x or big endian or... ) and fills the disk (an
Hi Elizabeth,
On 18-04-2023 22:46, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote:
I noticed that the Munin graphs are showing that the queue problems
from earlier this year seem to have been reduced now, is that correct,
or has the VM just not been restarted lately? It would be helpful to
have a starting point.
I
Dear s390x porters,
Recently I added isolation-machine [1] support to ci.debian.net on
amd64. At this moment, I think performance wise the only architecture
that qualifies in our infrastructure to add it too is s390x. However,
autopkgtest-build-qemu doesn't know what to do yet. Would any of yo
Hi all,
[s390x porters in CC, maybe they can help?]
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 22:22:54 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
Source: gnome-keyring
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in
testing [1]. Your
Package: liferea
Version: 1.15.6-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertag: s390x
Hi,
Today I was debugging the failing autopkgtest of liferea, a graphical
rss reader, on s390x [1]. Previously I already worked around another
crash
Hi all,
On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 09:22:32 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
Today I restarted the s390x host of ci.d.n because I lost access.
I have been fighting with the host for several days now, and I think I
finally found the culprit. Several days ago I configured the host to do:
# panic kernel on
Hi waldi,
On 24-07-2024 10:57 a.m., Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 08:06:46AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
However, that doesn't seem to work on our s390x host as it seems to freeze
instead. Is this something known? Something I'm doing wrong (E.g. these
options behaving d
Control: found -1 6.10.6-1~bpo12+1
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 s390x fails with vm.panic_on_oom=1 & kernel.panic=10
Hi,
On 18-07-2024 08:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
However, that doesn't seem to work on our s390x host as it seems to
freeze instead. Is this something known?
:37:33 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
Source: dnspython
Version: 2.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.7.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: frr
Version: 10.1.1-0.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 10.2-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team
Source: partclone
Version: 0.3.32+repack-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.3.33+repack-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
Dear maintainer(s
Source: kitty
Version: 0.39.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.40.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertag: s390x
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team consi
user debian-s390@lists.debian.org
usertag 1102106 s390x
thanks
Dear s390x porters,
Can you please have a look at bug 1102106? (Copied in full below for
your convenience)
Paul
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 07:20:13 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: src:git
Version: 1:2.49.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags
Source: frr
Version: 10.2.1-6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 10.3-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team co
Dear s390x porters,
This bug has your user tag already, but it wasn't X-Debbugs-CC to you,
you might want to help out. (Start of report below, full report from
https://bugs.debian.org/1103588)
Paul
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:40:01 +0200 Chris Hofstaedtler
wrote:
Source: python-xiaomi-ble
Vers
Source: dnspython
Version: 2.7.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of dnspython the autopkgtest of dnspython fails in
te
Package: s390-tools
Version: 2.35.0-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390
Dear s390x people,
Two days ago, I upgraded the s390x ci.debian.net host from bookworm to
trixie. The system was already running the kernel from b
Package: initramfs-tools-core
Version: 0.147
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/lsinitramfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
Hi,
Two days ago, I upgraded the s390x ci.debian.net host from bookworm to
trixie. The system was already running
Source: assimp
Version: 5.2.5~ds0-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
Hi,
I was debugging performance issues on ci.debian.net today, and noticed
that assimp showed up in the journal for being killed by the oom-kille
Source: paperwork
Version: 2.2.5-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package because it
showed up
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi,
On 03-06-2025 21:40, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 03-06-2025 21:30, Paul Gevers wrote:
That file doesn't exist, but I found that /usr/lib/lib/udev/
rules.d/85- sysconfig-hardware.rules exists (note the double lib).
Looks like a bug in sysconfig-hardware
Source: lomiri-mediaplayer-app
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.1.1+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Dear maintainer(s),
The Re
Hi,
On 06-06-2025 18:29, Paul Gevers wrote:
With Bastian's patch was it fixed or is the issue still persisting?
I'm *guessing* that the problem is still there when I would boot into
the old kernel, as the kernel and its initramfs have not been updated.
However, maybe with the u
Source: openbabel
Version: 3.1.1+dfsg-12
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
Hi,
I was debugging performance issues on ci.debian.net today, and noticed
that s390x was running into memory problems. openbabel quickly be
Hi,
On 06-06-2025 11:10, Pranav P wrote:
So sorry for the late reply.
3.5 days and you call that late? Welcome to Debian, where we're not
supposed to be surprised if we need to wait weeks or months.
After an upgrade which triggered `update-initramfs`, I was also having the
issue where th
40 matches
Mail list logo
