Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

Hi! On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 08:22:09 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Kurt Roeckx: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:05:06PM +0200, ni...@thykier.net wrote: > >> * If we were to enable -fPIE/-pie by default in GCC-6, should that change > >>also apply to this port? [0] > > > > If -fPIE is the default

Re: Bug#845193: dpkg: recent -specs PIE changes break openssl

Hi! On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:52:33 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > clone 845193 -1 > reassign -1 dpkg > retitle -1 dpkg: please do not add -specs= flags only on some architectures > thanks I'm afraid I'll have to wontfix this because it is not really implementable. See belo

[RFC] The PIE unholy mess

Hi! I'd like to get some feedback from porters and package maintainers, given that this affects at least both groups. Some background first. One of the reasons PIE has in the past not been enabled by default in dpkg-buildflags, is because it introduced some slowness on some arches, although this

Re: Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie

Hi! On Sun, 2023-08-06 at 23:25:23 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Following the procedure to modify default dpkg-buildflags I propose to > enable -fstack-clash-protection on amd64. The bug for dpkg tracking this > is #918914. > > | -fstack-clash-protection > | Generate code to prevent stack cl

Bug#1063647: sysconfig: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

Source: sysconfig Version: 0.0.14 Severity: serious Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: sid trixie User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required