Hi everyone,
I am employed with IBM as a Debian maintainer for the S390x. I would like to
assume responsibility for this bundle. I previously replied to the bug below
about updating it due to OpenSSL errors.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080317
Many changes and bugs have b
Hello!
I want to draw attention to, from my point of view, open
questions/problems with the s390x architecture.
In short, it seems to me, that:
a) there are no porters left (to fix serious problems)
b) various packages already ignore s390x (gnome? others?)
c) general, including upstreams, interes
In view of recent discussions on Debian lists for big-endian systems
about the problem of undesirable little-endian assumptions in some
software packages, this snippet from a posting to the
openssh-unix-...@mindrot.org may be of interest:
>> ...
>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 5:48â¯AM Damien Miller
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 5:49 AM Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>
> > It also appears true that IBM has an interest in s390x, but today
> I wonder if their interest could actually be just in Debian providing
> a base for the Ubuntu port (which I understand used to be
On Oct 28, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> It also appears true that IBM has an interest in s390x, but today
I wonder if their interest could actually be just in Debian providing
a base for the Ubuntu port (which I understand used to be funded by
IBM).
And if this is still true now that IBM owns Re
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 at 10:24:04 +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> b) various packages already ignore s390x (gnome? others?)
GNOME is currently buildable on s390x, but we have to ignore a lot of test
failures related to incorrect endianness of colour channels in image data
(for example in GTK 3, G
6 matches
Mail list logo
