.
Андрей
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.x
> On Thu, 26 May 2005, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > sorry for this post, but somehow it is self-explained
> >
> ..
Hi,
sorry for this post, but somehow it is self-explained
- Original Message -
From: "Andrei Emeltchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:57 AM
Subject: gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.x
gcc-2.95
gcc-3.4
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:gcc-bug$ gcc-3.4 init-test.c
Hi,
sorry for this post, but somehow it is self-explained
- Original Message -
From: "Andrei Emeltchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:57 AM
Subject: gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.x
gcc-2.95
gcc-3.4
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:gcc-bug$ gcc-3.4 init-test.c
?, ?? ?? ? ??? ? ?
2 ???:
gcc-2.95
gcc-3.4
---?? ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:gcc-bug$ gcc-3.4 init-test.c
init-test.c:23: error: initializer element is not constant
init-test.c:23: error: (near initialization for `union_table[0]')
--
ÐÐÑÐÐ, Ð ÐÐ ÐÐÐÑÑÐ ÐÑÐÐ ÐÐÐÑÑÑ ÐÐÑÑÐÑÐÐ SDL_gui ?
5 matches
Mail list logo