Hi,
El Martes, 6 de mayo de 2014 22:50:29 Christian Hofstaedtler escribió:
> * Antonio Terceiro [140506 22:48]:
> > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:57:37AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 05:00:58PM +0200, David Suárez wrote:
> > > > El Domingo, 4 de mayo de 2014 16:06:50
* Antonio Terceiro [140506 22:48]:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:57:37AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 05:00:58PM +0200, David Suárez wrote:
> > > El Domingo, 4 de mayo de 2014 16:06:50 Christian Hofstaedtler escribió:
> > > > Upstream said something about LE vs. BE:
>
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:57:37AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 05:00:58PM +0200, David Suárez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > El Domingo, 4 de mayo de 2014 16:06:50 Christian Hofstaedtler escribió:
> > > Upstream said something about LE vs. BE:
> > > https://github.com/sparklem
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 05:00:58PM +0200, David Suárez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> El Domingo, 4 de mayo de 2014 16:06:50 Christian Hofstaedtler escribió:
> > Upstream said something about LE vs. BE:
> > https://github.com/sparklemotion/sqlite3-ruby/issues/128
>
> If you look at s390x build log:
>
> > Expe
Hi,
El Domingo, 4 de mayo de 2014 16:06:50 Christian Hofstaedtler escribió:
> Upstream said something about LE vs. BE:
> https://github.com/sparklemotion/sqlite3-ruby/issues/128
If you look at s390x build log:
> Expected: "foo"
> Actual: "\u6600\u6F00\u6F00"
and then, reverse the bytes on each
Dear list,
ruby-sqlite3 currently FTBFS on some archs (#745929).
This will very likely block the ruby1.9.1-rm transition, so it
really needs fixing soon.
Upstream said something about LE vs. BE:
https://github.com/sparklemotion/sqlite3-ruby/issues/128
I currently don't have the time to look int
6 matches
Mail list logo