Jonas,
* Jonas Genannt [131219 21:14]:
> there was no progress on ruby-prof #566279 since 2010, I had a look at
> ruby-prof: (this
> adds also support for Ruby 1.9/2.0)
As Cedric has noted, ruby-prof failed to build on almost all
architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/pack
>
> > I took a look, but I don't feel comfortable with doing such a large
> > change via an NMU.
> >
> > I'd at least send the debdiff to the BTS and ask for an okay...
>
> Let's have the team adopt ruby-prof.
>
> - The current maintainer
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 08:12:14PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Jonas,
>
> * Jonas Genannt [131221 17:51]:
> > > I have switched package format to gem2deb and updated to an new upstream
> > > release.
> > >
> > > Should we move ruby-prof t
Jonas,
* Jonas Genannt [131221 17:51]:
> > I have switched package format to gem2deb and updated to an new upstream
> > release.
> >
> > Should we move ruby-prof to Ruby PKG extra or only NMU? Arnaud seems to be
> > inactive
> > since a while.
>
> Ma
Hello,
> I have switched package format to gem2deb and updated to an new upstream
> release.
>
> Should we move ruby-prof to Ruby PKG extra or only NMU? Arnaud seems to be
> inactive
> since a while.
Maintainer acknowledged NMU at #566279 Could any dd please have
Hello,
there was no progress on ruby-prof #566279 since 2010, I had a look at
ruby-prof: (this
adds also support for Ruby 1.9/2.0)
ruby-prof (0.13.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New Upstream Version (Closes: #566279)
* Switched package to gem2deb helper
6 matches
Mail list logo