initely need it for travis. But
> > I
> > will ask FTP masters to hold the package back until we reached a consensus.
> >
> > Antonio, what do you think? You maintained ruby-launchy-shim.
>
> when I wrote ruby-launchy-shim, I did it because launchy itself had a
>
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > Owner: Daniel Leidert
> > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
> > >
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA512
> > >
> > > * Package n
sts.debian.org, debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > * Package name: ruby-launchy
> > Version : 2.5.0
> > Upstream Author : Jeremy Hinegardner
> > * URL : https://gith
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Leidert
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: ruby-launchy
Version : 2.5.0
Upstream Author : Jeremy Hinegardner
* URL
to just upload and forget (err, I mean
> > do other things than discuss if/when to upload super small packages).
>
> FYI, I have just uploaded a ruby-launchy-shim package that will solve
> this. It is currently sitting in NEW. The code is in git.
... and it was just ACCEPTED. :)
so
gt; be easier to just bite the bullet and actually have launchy in Debian.
>
> Maybe this is a topic for the meeting? :-)
>
> Maybe if N >= 2 it makes sense to just upload and forget (err, I mean
> do other things than discuss if/when to upload super small packages).
FYI, I ha
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:22:23PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 01:50:12PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
>> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Abhijith PA
>> > wrote:
>> >
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:22:23PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 01:50:12PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Abhijith PA
> > wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Ruby-launchy is a dependency for ruby-let
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 01:50:12PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Abhijith PA
>> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Ruby-launchy is a dependency for ruby-letter-opener.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 01:50:12PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Abhijith PA wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Ruby-launchy is a dependency for ruby-letter-opener. Seems like it has a
> > repo in pkg-ruby-extras , but not uploaded to the archive.Mai
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Abhijith PA wrote:
> Hi
>
> Ruby-launchy is a dependency for ruby-letter-opener. Seems like it has a
> repo in pkg-ruby-extras , but not uploaded to the archive.Mailed the
> maintainer, and no reply yet.It will be nice if some DD from here can
>
Hi
Ruby-launchy is a dependency for ruby-letter-opener. Seems like it has a
repo in pkg-ruby-extras , but not uploaded to the archive.Mailed the
maintainer, and no reply yet.It will be nice if some DD from here can
take care of this.?
--
അഭിജിത്ത്
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Hi, sorry for late response.
At Sun, 9 Mar 2014 11:19:57 +0100,
Cédric Boutillier wrote:
>
- snip-
>
> I think we should evaluate what is the more expensive in terms of
> maintenance costs, between:
> - having a ruby-launchy package
> - maintaining simple patches to
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 02:23:08PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 February 2014 11:55:25 Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > The last point to do was renaming /usr/bin/launchy to something else
> > (launchy-rb?) because there was already a binary with that name in the
> > archive. If
reate/provide new abstraction layer in order to
> resolve dependencies and use xdg-open directly.
> Again, we should provides ruby-launchy package.
The argument of rubygems-integration is interesting, and I haven't
thought of it. However, launchy is listed as a development dependency,
so appl
create/provide new abstraction layer in order to
resolve dependencies and use xdg-open directly.
Again, we should provides ruby-launchy package.
Best Wishes,
Youhei
---
Youhei SASAKI
GPG fingerprint:
4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07
--
To UNSUBSC
On Tuesday 25 February 2014 11:55:25 Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> The last point to do was renaming /usr/bin/launchy to something else
> (launchy-rb?) because there was already a binary with that name in the
> archive. If I remember well, the rest was more than OK.
I'm beginning to wonder if packagi
Hi Dominique,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 02:10:18PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Hello Gioele
> What is the status on your packaging work of ruby-launchy ?
> There a TODO in the git repo mentioning work once ruby-spoon is packaged.
> This
> is now done.
> Is there so
Hello Gioele
What is the status on your packaging work of ruby-launchy ?
There a TODO in the git repo mentioning work once ruby-spoon is packaged. This
is now done.
Is there something to be done before review and upload ?
All the best
--
https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http
gt; Also, is there a debian way to rename files or should I patch the
> sources to have a different executable?
You can just move the file after the installation by overriding the
dh_install target. Something like:
override_dh_install:
dh_install
mv debian/ruby-launchy/usr/
Il 05/10/2013 19:03, Cédric Boutillier ha scritto:
There is another issue that should be fixed: currently, there is a
launchy package shipping /usr/bin/launchy. You should rename the file
you install to usr/bin/launchy to launchy-rb or launchy-ruby to avoid a
conflict.
Hi,
I filed a bug upstre
ll to usr/bin/launchy to launchy-rb or launchy-ruby to avoid a
> >conflict.
> What about not installing it at all and creating instead another
> package ruby-launchy-cli (from the same source) that installs that
> file as /usr/bin/launcy-ruby?
The bin/launchy file is three-line long
installing it at all and creating instead another package
ruby-launchy-cli (from the same source) that installs that file as
/usr/bin/launcy-ruby?
Bye,
--
Gioele Barabucci
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Hi,
I haven't looked at the packaging in details yet, but here are a couple
of suggestions.
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 06:32:33PM +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> Hello,
> I made various fixes to the existing ruby-launchy repository on
> alioth, including updating ruby-launchy
Hello,
I made various fixes to the existing ruby-launchy repository on alioth,
including updating ruby-launchy to the current upstream version. I
removed some problematic tests that had no impact on Linux systems anyway.
There is a problem with JRuby. Launchy requires an additional gem
Il 04/10/2013 08:05, Cédric Boutillier ha scritto:
There was already an ITP for ruby-launchy. It has a repository in the
team's infrastructure. Please feel free to use it as a starting point
and finish the packaging (well, looking at the repo, all the work is
still to be done :)
Control: merge -1 623914
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:43:42AM +, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Gioele Barabucci
> * Package name: ruby-launchy
> Version : 2.3.0
> Upstream Author : Jeremy Hinegardner
> * U
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gioele Barabucci
* Package name: ruby-launchy
Version : 2.3.0
Upstream Author : Jeremy Hinegardner
* URL : http://rubygems.org/gems/launchy
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : helper class for
28 matches
Mail list logo
