Re: ruby-defaults with switch to ruby2.1 uploaded to experimental

2014-05-08 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Christian Hofstaedtler: > Actually the packages listed on the tracker are no longer the blockers; > the blockers are: > coquelicot, ruby-gnome2, ruby-patron, sup-mail, xapian-bindings I have uploaded a fixed version of Coquelicot on the 5th. It should migrate on the 15th. Asking the release team t

Re: ruby-defaults with switch to ruby2.1 uploaded to experimental

2014-05-08 Thread Paul van Tilburg
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:50:01PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > Actually the packages listed on the tracker are no longer the blockers; > the blockers are: > coquelicot, ruby-gnome2, ruby-patron, sup-mail, xapian-bindings A non-blocking ruby-gnome2 is in NEW. (Well, that sounds contradic

Re: ruby-defaults with switch to ruby2.1 uploaded to experimental

2014-05-07 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
* Antonio Terceiro [140507 23:26]: [..] > I have just uploaded ruby-defaults to experimental, switching the > default to ruby2.1 and dropping ruby2.0 from ruby-all-dev. That means > that if you have ruby-all-dev >= 1:2.1.0.0 installed, compiled > extensions for ruby2.0 will no longer be built. Gr

ruby-defaults with switch to ruby2.1 uploaded to experimental

2014-05-07 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hello everyone, As we might be aware already, our plan is to ship jessie with Ruby 2.1 as the default (and only) Ruby interpreter. I have just uploaded ruby-defaults to experimental, switching the default to ruby2.1 and dropping ruby2.0 from ruby-all-dev. That means that if you have ruby-all-dev