Hi,
On 20-02-29 17:33:40, Gabriel Filion wrote:
> I don't quite know what those feature are, but if I understand
> correctly you mean you would remove the file to avoid the licensing
> issue altogether?
Exactly.
> The problem is that this file is the core of this library's
> functionality, e.g.
On 2020-02-24 8:51 p.m., Georg Faerber wrote:
> On 20-02-15 19:30:33, Gabriel Filion wrote
> I guess, personally, I would just get rid of this file via a
> Files-Excluded: stanza in debian/copyright and leveraging the repack
> feature of debian/watch to repack (to remove said file) the upstream
> t
Hi,
On 20-02-15 19:30:33, Gabriel Filion wrote:
> There's one package that I need to create as a dependency of
> puppet-development-kit for which I had some questions pop to mind
> about licensing: ruby-spdx-licenses
>
> The code ships a json file that contains information about all of the
> lice
Hello,
There's one package that I need to create as a dependency of
puppet-development-kit for which I had some questions pop to mind about
licensing: ruby-spdx-licenses
The code ships a json file that contains information about all of the
licenses that the library helps with identifying. This js
4 matches
Mail list logo
