Re: Transition of Ruby packages to the new Ruby policy

2012-04-29 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 00:27:49 +0200 Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Dear Francesco, > > Thank you for your message. Please find below confirmations about > (almost) all your statements. [...] Thanks a lot for your kind reply. Notifications through the BTS will be very appreciated. Bye and keep up the

Re: Transition of Ruby packages to the new Ruby policy

2012-04-28 Thread Cédric Boutillier
[Resending the email to the list, spelling correctly the address] Hi James, On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:08:26PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > It's not clear to me from the email what I'm supposed to do in this > case. > Vim Build-Depends on ruby1.8(-dev) in order to enable the ruby bindings. > Thi

Re: Transition of Ruby packages to the new Ruby policy

2012-04-28 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Dear Francesco, Thank you for your message. Please find below confirmations about (almost) all your statements. On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:44:33PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > Could someone please confirm the following? > (A) Since apt-listbugs is an application (and not a library) and a > D

Re: Transition of Ruby packages to the new Ruby policy

2012-04-28 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Dear Russ, On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:27:35PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Using a Makefile generated by an extconf.rb file, I currently do: > make install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp \ > RUBYARCHDIR='$$(archdir)$$(target_prefix)' > What should I change that to instead? Is there a

Re: Transition of Ruby packages to the new Ruby policy

2012-04-27 Thread Russ Allbery
(Please copy me on replies, as I'm not subscribed to debian-ruby.) Cédric Boutillier writes: > Install locations for libraries > === > Libraries not bundled with the Ruby interpreters should be installed > somewhere in /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby directory, instead of

Re: Transition of Ruby packages to the new Ruby policy

2012-04-27 Thread James McCoy
[Please Cc me on replies] On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:08:34PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > In a few weeks from now, Wheezy will be frozen. One of the goals of the > Ruby Team for Wheezy is to try to push as far as possible the transition > to a new policy for Ruby library. > > You receive thi

Re: Transition of Ruby packages to the new Ruby policy

2012-04-27 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:08:34 +0200 Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi! > > In a few weeks from now, Wheezy will be frozen. One of the goals of the > Ruby Team for Wheezy is to try to push as far as possible the transition > to a new policy for Ruby library. > > You receive this email because you are

Re: Transition of Ruby packages to the new Ruby policy

2012-04-27 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:08:34PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi! Hi, > In a few weeks from now, Wheezy will be frozen. One of the goals of the > Ruby Team for Wheezy is to try to push as far as possible the transition > to a new policy for Ruby library. > > You receive this email because

Transition of Ruby packages to the new Ruby policy

2012-04-27 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi! In a few weeks from now, Wheezy will be frozen. One of the goals of the Ruby Team for Wheezy is to try to push as far as possible the transition to a new policy for Ruby library. You receive this email because you are listed as the maintainer or uploader of a Ruby package which has been detec