Re: Ruby transitions and gemspec files

* Paul Wise [140512 09:13]: > Is this something I should file a bug about or will it be handled during > the ruby2.0/ruby2.1 transitions? BTW, there was already some discussion about this on d-d: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/05/msg00012.html -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler : :

Re: Ruby transitions and gemspec files

On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 09:20 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > (Most) Packages that need reuploading/fixing can be found by > inspecting the Ruby-Versions field, if it still says ruby1.8 or > ruby1.9.1 then it's very likely affected. According to a quick grep of sid main Packages there are 14

Re: Ruby transitions and gemspec files

Paul, Let me answer with a summary answer below: * Paul Wise [140512 09:13]: > I noted that ruby-term-ansicolor doesn't provide a gemspec file for > ruby2.0 (just 1.9.1 and 1.8) and doesn't declare this in its > dependencies. Simply rebuilding ruby-term-ansicolor with a current > chroot of unsta

Ruby transitions and gemspec files

Hi all, I noted that ruby-term-ansicolor doesn't provide a gemspec file for ruby2.0 (just 1.9.1 and 1.8) and doesn't declare this in its dependencies. Simply rebuilding ruby-term-ansicolor with a current chroot of unstable will fix this it seems since it only creates one gemspec file in the 'all'