On ചൊവ്വ 27 മാർച്ച് 2018 04:17 വൈകു, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Sure -- I was just wondering, if this package is still used? Popcon
> seems quite low, and there are no (build) rdepends.
>
This is a test dependency of diaspora.
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/diaspora/blob/master/Gemfile#L285
We a
Hi,
On 18-03-27 10:03:37, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On March 27, 2018 3:01:33 AM GMT+05:30, Georg Faerber
> wrote:
> >- ruby-factory-girl-rails: @Pirate: If you need help with this, tell
> > me.
>
> If you can do it, that'll be good. I don't know when I'll come back to
> this package.
Sure -- I
On March 27, 2018 3:01:33 AM GMT+05:30, Georg Faerber wrote:
>- ruby-factory-girl-rails: @Pirate: If you need help with this, tell
>me.
If you can do it, that'll be good. I don't know when I'll come back to this
package.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevit
On 18-03-14 16:53:42, Georg Faerber wrote:
> On 18-03-14 10:18:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:36:14AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote:
> > > Reverse dependencies are then able to change their dependency
> > > anytime they wish.
> >
> > yes, but ideally we want to push that
For the record, I uploaded this package.
Cheers,
Cédric
On 18-03-14 16:53:42, Georg Faerber wrote:
> On 18-03-14 10:18:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:36:14AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote:
> > > On 18-03-13 16:30:16, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote:
> > > > > On 18-03
On 18-03-14 10:18:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:36:14AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote:
> > On 18-03-13 16:30:16, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote:
> > > > On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > > > > ruby
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:36:14AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote:
> On 18-03-13 16:30:16, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote:
> > > On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > > > ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of dependency
On 18-03-13 16:30:16, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote:
> > On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > > ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of dependency checking
> > > looking for a factory_girl gemspec file instead of a fa
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of dependency checking
> > looking for a factory_girl gemspec file instead of a factory_bot.
> >
> > I don't know if it is bet
Hi Cédric, all,
On 18-03-04 22:04:46, Georg Faerber wrote:
> On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of dependency
> > checking looking for a factory_girl gemspec file instead of a
> > factory_bot.
> >
> > I don't know if it is better to f
Hi,
On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of dependency checking
> looking for a factory_girl gemspec file instead of a factory_bot.
>
> I don't know if it is better to fix factory-girl-rails gemspecs, or to
> ship also the factor_girl.gem
On 18-03-03 15:35:29, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I think it should be also 'autopkgtest-pkg-ruby' instead of
> 'autopkgtest' for Testsuite field in debian/control but the smart
> autopkgtest seems to detect that it is indeed a ruby package anyway.
Thanks, it worked with 'autopkgtest' as well, but
Hi Cédric,
Thanks for your review.
On 18-03-03 15:05:14, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I would just propose to include the old changelog from
> ruby-factory-girl, so that the history is not gone, when the source
> package ruby-factory-girl is removed.
Done.
> Please keep also the previous uploader
And a last detail:
ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of dependency checking
looking for a factory_girl gemspec file instead of a factory_bot.
I don't know if it is better to fix factory-girl-rails gemspecs, or to ship
also the factor_girl.gemspec file too with ruby-factory-bot.
Cédr
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 03:05:14PM +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> It looks fine for me too. I would just propose to include the old
> changelog from ruby-factory-girl, so that the history is not gone, when
> the source package ruby-factory-girl is removed.
> Please keep also the previous uploade
It looks fine for me too. I would just propose to include the old
changelog from ruby-factory-girl, so that the history is not gone, when
the source package ruby-factory-girl is removed.
Please keep also the previous uploaders in the control file.
Cédric
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2/26/18, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Could you / someone else continue with the review, or, in case
> everything is fine, upload the package?
Looks good for me, but I don't have upload privileges :)
Hi Hleb, all,
On 18-02-19 20:07:44, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the review, I've created a repo now [1].
>
> On 18-02-19 10:53:00, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> > On 2/19/18, Georg Faerber wrote:
> > > I've worked on this now, and would be more than happy, if someone could
> > > review my w
Hi Hleb,
Thanks a lot for the review, I've created a repo now [1].
On 18-02-19 10:53:00, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> On 2/19/18, Georg Faerber wrote:
> > I've worked on this now, and would be more than happy, if someone could
> > review my work [1]. Note: That's not yet ready for upload, before, I
>
On 2/19/18, Georg Faerber wrote:
> I've worked on this now, and would be more than happy, if someone could
> review my work [1]. Note: That's not yet ready for upload, before, I
d/changelog:
Please remove this line as this is not an initial release:
* Initial release.
d/files, d/ruby-factory-b
Hi all,
On 17-12-01 00:14:14, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Upstream decided [1] to rename factory-girl to factory-bot, because
> "The name "Factory Girl" was confusing to some developers who
> encountered this library, and offensive or problematic to others." [2]
>
> We're using this in schleuder, ther
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 12:14:14AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Upstream decided [1] to rename factory-girl to factory-bot, because "The
> name "Factory Girl" was confusing to some developers who encountered
> this library, and offensive or problematic to others." [2]
>
> We're using
Hi
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:43:49AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I think renaming and updating reverse dependencies will be enough. It
> will still have to go through NEW and once it clears, you will need
> update reverse dependencies and request removal of old package.
The new source packag
On വെള്ളി 01 ഡിസംബര് 2017 04:44 രാവിലെ, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Upstream decided [1] to rename factory-girl to factory-bot, because "The
> name "Factory Girl" was confusing to some developers who encountered
> this library, and offensive or problematic to others." [2]
>
> We're using
Hi all,
Upstream decided [1] to rename factory-girl to factory-bot, because "The
name "Factory Girl" was confusing to some developers who encountered
this library, and offensive or problematic to others." [2]
We're using this in schleuder, therefore I would like to update the name
accordingly.
H
26 matches
Mail list logo
