Re: ruby-prof

2013-12-25 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
Jonas, * Jonas Genannt [131219 21:14]: > there was no progress on ruby-prof #566279 since 2010, I had a look at > ruby-prof: (this > adds also support for Ruby 1.9/2.0) As Cedric has noted, ruby-prof failed to build on almost all architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rub

Re: ruby-prof

2013-12-23 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
* Antonio Terceiro [131223 22:56]: > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 08:12:14PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > > Jonas, > > > > * Jonas Genannt [131221 17:51]: > > > > I have switched package format to gem2deb and updated to an new > > > > upstream release. > > > > > > > > Should we move ruby-

Re: ruby-prof

2013-12-23 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 08:12:14PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > Jonas, > > * Jonas Genannt [131221 17:51]: > > > I have switched package format to gem2deb and updated to an new upstream > > > release. > > > > > > Should we move ruby-prof to Ruby PKG extra or only NMU? Arnaud seems to

Re: ruby-prof

2013-12-22 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
Jonas, * Jonas Genannt [131221 17:51]: > > I have switched package format to gem2deb and updated to an new upstream > > release. > > > > Should we move ruby-prof to Ruby PKG extra or only NMU? Arnaud seems to be > > inactive > > since a while. > > Maintainer acknowledged NMU at #566279 Could

Re: ruby-prof

2013-12-21 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello, > I have switched package format to gem2deb and updated to an new upstream > release. > > Should we move ruby-prof to Ruby PKG extra or only NMU? Arnaud seems to be > inactive > since a while. Maintainer acknowledged NMU at #566279 Could any dd please have a look? ;) Thanks, Jo