Re: JRuby packaging

2011-09-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Alex Young escreveu isso aí: > jruby_1.5.1+dfsg4-2 has been accepted into main. Nice. :) > It'd probably be a good idea for someone more familiar with the new > Ruby policy to take a quick look at the package (if that hasn't > already happened) to make sure there's nothing lurking that needs > at

Re: JRuby packaging

2011-09-20 Thread Alex Young
On 11/09/2011 20:17, Antonio Terceiro wrote: Hello Alex, Alex Young escreveu isso aí: Hi all, Is anyone working on packaging a more recent jruby version than 1.5.1? That's a pretty archaic release by today's standards, and the only commonly available newer packages are 1.5.6 in an ubuntu ppa.

Re: JRuby packaging

2011-09-15 Thread Alex Young
On 11/09/11 20:17, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hello Alex, > > Alex Young escreveu isso aí: >> Hi all, >> >> Is anyone working on packaging a more recent jruby version than 1.5.1? >> That's a pretty archaic release by today's standards, and the only >> commonly available newer packages are 1.5.6 in

Re: JRuby packaging

2011-09-11 Thread Alex Young
On 11/09/2011 20:17, Antonio Terceiro wrote: Hello Alex, Alex Young escreveu isso aí: Hi all, Is anyone working on packaging a more recent jruby version than 1.5.1? That's a pretty archaic release by today's standards, and the only commonly available newer packages are 1.5.6 in an ubuntu ppa.

Re: JRuby packaging

2011-09-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hello Alex, Alex Young escreveu isso aí: > Hi all, > > Is anyone working on packaging a more recent jruby version than 1.5.1? > That's a pretty archaic release by today's standards, and the only > commonly available newer packages are 1.5.6 in an ubuntu ppa. > > If there's no reason a 1.6.x vers