Re: Gitlab packaging project funding status changed.

On ചൊ, ജൂൺ 28 2022 at 06:13:32 വൈകു +00:00:00 +00:00:00, Georg Faerber wrote: Hi, On 22-06-28 18:37:27, Pirate Praveen wrote: tells: [...] Gitlab Inc sponsored work on this project for 6+ years until recently. Now we are looking for the commun

Re: Gitlab packaging project funding status changed.

Hi, On 22-06-28 18:37:27, Pirate Praveen wrote: > tells: [...] Gitlab Inc sponsored work on this project for 6+ years until recently. Now we are looking for the community to support it Did GitLab Inc. announce in public that they're not sponsoring this

Re: Gitlab packaging project funding status changed.

We have started an Open Collective to ask Free Software community to donate to continue maintaining gitlab and dependencies. Spread the word.

Re: GitLab packaging

I totally agree about starting off easy. I’ll probably start off with the projects you mentioned since I don’t know which are easy just yet :D I just started looking into Jenkins for work work so that works out great as well. I haven’t looked at Docker just yet, so I’ll check it out. You guys h

Re: GitLab packaging

On 4 Oct 2014, at 2:23 pm, Daniel Polanco wrote: > Hello all: > > After looking a bit a the mailing list, I realized I might be a bit under > qualified to package GitLab myself. I’m a fairly new programmer, but I’m very > interested in giving back to the community. A big part is that it would

Re: GitLab packaging

On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Saturday 04 October 2014 09:53 AM, Daniel Polanco wrote: >> Hello all: >> >> After looking a bit a the mailing list, I realized I might be a bit >> under qualified to package GitLab myself. I’m a fairly new programmer, >> but I’m very inte

Re: GitLab packaging

On Saturday 04 October 2014 09:53 AM, Daniel Polanco wrote: > Hello all: > > After looking a bit a the mailing list, I realized I might be a bit > under qualified to package GitLab myself. I’m a fairly new programmer, > but I’m very interested in giving back to the community. A big part is > that

Re: Re: GitLab packaging

Hello all: After looking a bit a the mailing list, I realized I might be a bit under qualified to package GitLab myself. I’m a fairly new programmer, but I’m very interested in giving back to the community. A big part is that it would take me a while to learn Ruby if that’s what is required to

Re: GitLab packaging

Hi Cédric, For our forks we would add the changes to the readme and update the metadata. We just updated the readme for GitLab Grit: https://github.com/gitlabhq/grit/compare/aa09ee7131dbe8338b0a27ed1c96f74d824c8911...master (the metadata was already up to date) What do you think? Best regards, S

Re: GitLab packaging

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:06:28PM +0100, Sytse Sijbrandij wrote: > >> There will probably also be the need to add configuration points to > >> GitLab to accommodate a different directory structure, we are open to > >> help with this. > > > > Yes, having global constants to be able to change easil

Re: GitLab packaging

Dear Cédric, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Dear Sytse, > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 04:57:38PM +0100, Sytse Sijbrandij wrote: >> Dear people, > >> I'm the CEO of GitLab.com and would like to offer our help to package it. > >> I read the conversation about packaging

Re: GitLab packaging

Dear Sytse, On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 04:57:38PM +0100, Sytse Sijbrandij wrote: > Dear people, > I'm the CEO of GitLab.com and would like to offer our help to package it. > I read the conversation about packaging GitLab for Debian in: > Current status https://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2014/03/