Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-09 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:49:03AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 06/08/2013 10:25 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:28:23PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > >>On 06/05/2013 11:50 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >>> > >>>I will be happy to replace my very simple Rails test which yours. I

Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-09 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/08/2013 10:25 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:28:23PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: On 06/05/2013 11:50 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: I will be happy to replace my very simple Rails test which yours. Is there a way to run those tests without installing anything, so that I c

Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-08 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:28:23PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 06/05/2013 11:50 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > >I will be happy to replace my very simple Rails test which yours. Is > >there a way to run those tests without installing anything, so that I > >can just do `apt-get install rails` and

Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-08 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi Sam, Thanks for looking at this. :-) I see you already have some progress reported in a later email, I will follow up there as well. On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:31:59PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: [snip] > So the offer is: if you help me get started, I'll promise to add > more value than the time I

Re: Fwd: Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-06 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Dear Sam, On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 05:05:24PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > The first problem is that an install of ruby-bcrypt doesn't make the > bcrypt-ruby gem available. See http://paste.debian.net/8886/. This problem should have been solved with the upload of ruby-bcrypt 3.0.1-3, which happend

Fwd: Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-06 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/05/2013 11:50 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: I will be happy to replace my very simple Rails test which yours. Is there a way to run those tests without installing anything, so that I can just do `apt-get install rails` and then run the tests? I couldn't figure this out from a quick read at t

Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-05 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/05/2013 11:50 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:48:52AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: On 06/05/2013 12:31 AM, Praveen A wrote: We should add a package that runs at least these sequence of commands rails new foobar rake test when any of the dependencies for the default a

Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:36:34AM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Or we just add Breaks: ruby-actionpack-3.2 to rack 1.5, cross fingers > and upgrade to rails 4.0 as soon as possible (unless rack 1.5 already > migrated to testing). In the meanwhile I think we should just not allow ruby-rack into test

Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:48:52AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 06/05/2013 12:31 AM, Praveen A wrote: > >We should add a package that runs at least these sequence of commands > >rails new foobar rake test when any of the dependencies for the > >default app is changed and make all those packages

Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-04 Thread Ondřej Surý
Or we just add Breaks: ruby-actionpack-3.2 to rack 1.5, cross fingers and upgrade to rails 4.0 as soon as possible (unless rack 1.5 already migrated to testing). Ondřej Surý On 5. 6. 2013, at 0:54, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:20:55PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: >> On 06/04

Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-04 Thread Praveen A
Hi Sam, Did you add your ssh keys to alioth? You should get read access even before you are accepted into pkg-ruby-extras project. You can also use the anonymous url for now. Praveen On Jun 5, 2013 10:19 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote: On 06/05/2013 12:31 AM, Praveen A wrote: > > We should add a package

Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-04 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/05/2013 12:31 AM, Praveen A wrote: We should add a package that runs at least these sequence of commands rails new foobar rake test when any of the dependencies for the default app is changed and make all those packages depend on this test package. Or we could have some other method wh

Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-04 Thread Praveen A
We should add a package that runs at least these sequence of commands rails new foobar rake test when any of the dependencies for the default app is changed and make all those packages depend on this test package. Or we could have some other method which will notify us when we break this loop.

Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-04 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:20:55PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 06/04/2013 09:26 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:38:29AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > >>But given that sid has ruby1.8 and ruby1.9.1, and you appear to be > >>doing the early work towards rails 4.0 (excellent!), wh