Re: RFS : ruby-domain-name

2016-03-07 Thread sudheesh shetty
Not yet. Will update the status tomorrow. On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:37 PM, sudheesh shetty wrote: > Hi, > > I have fixed the bug #817011 of ruby-domain-name and committed the changes. > > The path for repo is > > pkg-ruby-extras/rubydomain-name > > consider to review an upload it. > > Thanks, >

RFS : ruby-domain-name

2016-03-07 Thread sudheesh shetty
Hi, I have fixed the bug #817011 of ruby-domain-name and committed the changes. The path for repo is pkg-ruby-extras/rubydomain-name consider to review an upload it. Thanks, Sudheesh

RFS: ruby-domain-name

2014-10-10 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-domain-name (0.5.21-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * Imported Upstream version 0.5.21 * d/control: - changed homepage to https - bumped up standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) - added tes

Re: RFS: ruby-domain-name

2012-06-29 Thread Paul van Tilburg
Hey, On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 03:35:00PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > I've updated ruby-domain-name to a new upstream version and to build with > gem2deb >=0.3.0. The package is lintian clean and builds fine in a clean > environment. > > I took the liberty to set the license of debian/* to BS

RFS: ruby-domain-name

2012-06-28 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi! I've updated ruby-domain-name to a new upstream version and to build with gem2deb >=0.3.0. The package is lintian clean and builds fine in a clean environment. I took the liberty to set the license of debian/* to BSD-2-clause, as the upstream project, since the license for these files was mis