On 4/4/18, Georg Faerber wrote:
>> I've checked ruby-gettext-setup and can say that it doesn't actually
>> use anything from gettext gem, only from fast-gettext. So its test
>> failures caused by something else, not the new gettext version.
> I would be interested in how you came to this conclusi
Hi Hleb, all,
On 18-03-21 23:29:33, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> On 3/21/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > Is it "normal" that ruby-gettext-setup tests fail with the new
> > ruby-gettext? They seem to pass with the current version on
> > ci.debian.net.
>
> I've checked ruby-gettext-setup and can say th
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 07:06:36PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> I've implemented your suggestion.
Uploaded!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 3/22/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I would rather see this minimal patch to disallow gecode engine in
> ruby-solve, and a Breaks: berkshelf (<= current version)
> instead of the Conflicts: ruby-dep-selector.
> I think it would ease a lot upgrade path if we just prevent ruby-solve
> from using
On 18-03-21 23:34:50, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:29:33PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> > On 3/21/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
>
> > > Is it "normal" that ruby-gettext-setup tests fail with the new
> > > ruby-gettext? They seem to pass with the current version on
> > > c
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:29:33PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> On 3/21/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > Is it "normal" that ruby-gettext-setup tests fail with the new
> > ruby-gettext? They seem to pass with the current version on
> > ci.debian.net.
> I've checked ruby-gettext-setup and can sa
On 3/21/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Is it "normal" that ruby-gettext-setup tests fail with the new
> ruby-gettext? They seem to pass with the current version on
> ci.debian.net.
I've checked ruby-gettext-setup and can say that it doesn't actually
use anything from gettext gem, only from fast-
ruby-kgio uploaded.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hi!
I uploaded ruby-tzinfo. I just added the Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-ruby
in the control file.
Is it "normal" that ruby-gettext-setup tests fail with the new
ruby-gettext? They seem to pass with the current version on
ci.debian.net.
For ruby-solve, I couldn't run the tests for berkshelf with
On 3/20/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Could you please update the Standards-Version field and the debhelper
> compatibility for these packages, as well as switching the debian/watch
> to https?
Done. I usually don't change them if lintian doesn't say to.
> Can you clarify the situation of ruby
Hi Hleb,
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 04:17:19PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> * just a new minor version + vcs-* updated:
>- ruby-tzinfo
>- ruby-gettext
>- ruby-kgio
> * a new major version + d/control changes to prevent broken
> ruby-dep-selector installation
>- ruby-solve
Could y
Hi team!
I've prepared new version for the following packages:
* just a new minor version + vcs-* updated:
- ruby-tzinfo
- ruby-gettext
- ruby-kgio
* a new major version + d/control changes to prevent broken
ruby-dep-selector installation
- ruby-solve
Please review and upload them
* Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> [161003 10:55]:
> Hi team!
>
> Recently tzdata priority was lowered so in build environments its not
> installed anymore. This causes test failures for packages which
> depends on ruby-tzinfo.
>
> I've prepared a new release ruby-tzinfo, now it depends on tzdata
Hi team!
Recently tzdata priority was lowered so in build environments its not
installed anymore. This causes test failures for packages which
depends on ruby-tzinfo.
I've prepared a new release ruby-tzinfo, now it depends on tzdata.
Please upload.
Thanks in advance!
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:42:41AM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> On 9/14/15, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please upload ruby-tzinfo from jessie branch.
> >>>
> >>> Did you talk to -release about this already?
> >>
> >> No. It's a first time I need to update a package in stable, so
On 9/14/15, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote:
Please upload ruby-tzinfo from jessie branch.
>>>
>>> Did you talk to -release about this already?
>>
>> No. It's a first time I need to update a package in stable, so I don't
>> know the procedure.
>
>
> I've reported #798949 and received ap
On 9/8/15, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Please upload ruby-tzinfo from jessie branch.
>>
>> Did you talk to -release about this already?
>
> No. It's a first time I need to update a package in stable, so I don't
> know the procedure.
I've reported #798949 and received approve for u
On 9/8/15, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
>> Please upload ruby-tzinfo from jessie branch.
>
> Did you talk to -release about this already?
No. It's a first time I need to update a package in stable, so I don't
know the procedure.
* Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> [150908 14:36]:
> Hi team!
>
> Please upload ruby-tzinfo from jessie branch.
Did you talk to -release about this already?
--
,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03
`-
pgpO6WwgvRn
Hi team!
Please upload ruby-tzinfo from jessie branch.
Hleb Valoshka dijo [Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 02:35:18PM +0300]:
> As ruby-thread-safe at last entered archive we can upload new version
> of ruby-tzinfo. Thanks in advance.
Uploaded. Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
As ruby-thread-safe at last entered archive we can upload new version
of ruby-tzinfo. Thanks in advance.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAAB-KckfTzn2W
22 matches
Mail list logo
