Hi,
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 09:02:46AM +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> Can I remove the entire folder debian/tests if autopkgtest doesn't need any
> explicit directions?
> Or just the control.ex file? I was under the impression that
> debian/tests/control.ex was required for
> the autopkgtest to wor
Hi Cedric,
Thanks for the suggestions. Will do them. However, I have some doubts.
Please consider removing the autogenerated debian/tests/control.ex
file.
Can I remove the entire folder debian/tests if autopkgtest doesn't need
any explicit directions?
Or just the control.ex file? I was under
Hi Balasankar,
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:10:13PM +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> Hi
> I've prepared the packaging of ruby-test-unit-context. It has been
> tested with pbuilder and debci and found ok. Lintian check was also
> clean. The package has been pushed to alioth repo
> /git/pkg-ruby-extras/ru
Hi
I've prepared the packaging of ruby-test-unit-context. It has been
tested with pbuilder and debci and found ok. Lintian check was also
clean. The package has been pushed to alioth repo
/git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-test-unit-context.git
Consider to review it and upload it.
--
Regards
Balasankar C
Hi Cédric,
At Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:37:51 +0200,
Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 05:23:01PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
>
> > The following packages are ready to be uploaded.
> > Could you please sponsor them?
>
> > * ruby-test-unit-rr: RR adaptor for Ruby Unit::Test
> >* I
Hi Youhei,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 05:23:01PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
> Hi,
> The following packages are ready to be uploaded.
> Could you please sponsor them?
> * ruby-test-unit-rr: RR adaptor for Ruby Unit::Test
>* ITP: #715331
I've just uploaded it.
Best wishes,
Cédric
signature
Hi,
The following packages are ready to be uploaded.
Could you please sponsor them?
* ruby-test-unit-rr: RR adaptor for Ruby Unit::Test
* ITP: #715331
Best Wishes,
Youhei
---
Youhei SASAKI
GPG fingerprint:
4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07
--
T
Hi Cédric,
Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí:
> Dear list,
>
> Another ITP for ruby-test-unit had been submitted (#626792) before mine
> (#642095). The
> (ex-)owner accepted that I take over, so I changed the number of the bug
> to close in changelog.
>
> Moreover, upstream solved the encoding
2011/9/26 Cédric Boutillier :
> Dear list,
>
> Another ITP for ruby-test-unit had been submitted (#626792) before mine
> (#642095). The
> (ex-)owner accepted that I take over, so I changed the number of the bug
> to close in changelog.
Since your upload will close both bugs, you can close both of
Dear list,
Another ITP for ruby-test-unit had been submitted (#626792) before mine
(#642095). The
(ex-)owner accepted that I take over, so I changed the number of the bug
to close in changelog.
Moreover, upstream solved the encoding issue present in one of the tests
with LANG=C. I am now using i
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:56:40AM -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí:
> > Or I could mention in a README.Debian that one may expect some
> > changes in the behavior of testrb1.8 (more options, could be run with
> > ruby1.9.1) and testrb1.9.1 (not working) when ruby
Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:47:48PM +0530, Praveen A wrote:
> > 2011/9/22 Cédric Boutillier :
> > > Thank you very much for reviewing the package. I implemented your
> > > comments.
>
> > Is /usr/bin/testrb exactly same as the one that comes with ruby?
>
> We
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:47:48PM +0530, Praveen A wrote:
> 2011/9/22 Cédric Boutillier :
> > Thank you very much for reviewing the package. I implemented your comments.
> Is /usr/bin/testrb exactly same as the one that comes with ruby?
Well spotted, thank you, that is something I overlooked.
Th
2011/9/22 Cédric Boutillier :
> Thank you very much for reviewing the package. I implemented your comments.
Is /usr/bin/testrb exactly same as the one that comes with ruby?
> This is something I am struggling with indeed. I thought it could be a
> bug in lintian, since the Ruby license is a licen
Dear Praveen,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:12:46AM +0530, Praveen A wrote:
> Builds in clean chroot, it is lintian clean.
> I think you can remove the commented dependency section (only
> development dependencies are listed) in control file.
> Maybe you can add a comment to rules why you are over
2011/9/20 Cédric Boutillier :
> Hi!
>
> I prepared the packaging of ruby-test-unit. I have checked all the
> pointed listed on the wiki page, and the package is lintian-clean
> (except a warning for missing upstream changelog).
>
> Could you please review and possibly upload this package?
Builds i
Hi!
I prepared the packaging of ruby-test-unit. I have checked all the
pointed listed on the wiki page, and the package is lintian-clean
(except a warning for missing upstream changelog).
Could you please review and possibly upload this package?
Thank you in advance!
Best,
Cédric
si
17 matches
Mail list logo
