Hi,
The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
This package is required for packaging debian gitlab (see
https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/-/issues/195).
I push
On 10/08/22 01:57, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1 2022 at 07:29:38 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vivek K J
wrote:
Hi Team,
I've updated the package ruby-gitlab-fog-azure-rm from 1.2.0
to 1.3.0. The package is lintian clean and the updated package is
available at
https://salsa.debia
On Mon, Aug 1 2022 at 07:29:38 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vivek K J
wrote:
Hi Team,
I've updated the package ruby-gitlab-fog-azure-rm from 1.2.0
to 1.3.0. The package is lintian clean and the updated package is
available at
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-gitlab-fog-azure-rm/.
Hi Team,
I've updated the package ruby-gitlab-fog-azure-rm from 1.2.0
to 1.3.0. The package is lintian clean and the updated package is
available at
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-gitlab-fog-azure-rm/. No reverse
dependencies for this package.
Requesting For Sponsorship
On 24/9/21 9:23 PM, Abraham Raji wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The ruby-gitlab-experiment package is ready to be uploaded (I also
> verified the
> points listed on
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
> This package is a dependency for Gitlab.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/r
Hi,
The ruby-gitlab-experiment package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified
the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). This
package is a dependency for Gitlab.
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-gitlab-experiment
Could you please sponsor th
Hey,
On 22/09/19 11:51 pm, Priyanka Saggu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
> points listed on
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
>
> Could you please sponsor it?
>
> ruby-gitlab-sidekiq-fetcher 0.5.2-1
> [https:
Hi,
The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
Could you please sponsor it?
ruby-gitlab-sidekiq-fetcher 0.5.2-1
[https://salsa.debian.org/priyankasaggu119-guest/ruby-gitlab-sidekiq-fetch
Uploaded.
On 1/22/19 3:21 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *gitlab*. The package was
> tested on meta/build and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean.
> I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at
> https://salsa.de
Hi,I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *gitlab*. The
package wastested on meta/build and was successfully built. It was
also lintian clean.
I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-gitlab
Please consider to review and uplo
Uploaded, thanks for the improvements in the packaging Sophie :)
Cheers.
--
Lucas Kanashiro
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
Le 22/09/2017 à 14:39, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> On 09/22/2017 06:02 PM, Sophie Brun wrote:
>> I had also checked if there was another binary with this name in
>> archive. I don't know if the best is to keep the upstream name or to
>> change it to a less "generic" name (maybe gitlab-cli?).
>
On 09/22/2017 06:02 PM, Sophie Brun wrote:
> I had also checked if there was another binary with this name in
> archive. I don't know if the best is to keep the upstream name or to
> change it to a less "generic" name (maybe gitlab-cli?).
I think gitlab-cli would be a better name for the package (
Hi,
Le 21/09/2017 à 19:01, Lucas Kanashiro a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> After run lintian these 2 issues was reported:
>
> I: ruby-gitlab: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
> W: ruby-gitlab: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/gitlab
>
> The main point here for me is the absence of a CLI's manpage. I
Hi,
After run lintian these 2 issues was reported:
I: ruby-gitlab: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
W: ruby-gitlab: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/gitlab
The main point here for me is the absence of a CLI's manpage. I've
tried to install it and use it by myself but I can't, the help co
Le 21/09/2017 à 15:46, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> On 09/21/2017 06:47 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
>> After had a look in the spec/spec_helper.rb file I realized that it
>> tries to use require with a relative path, and this will not work in a
>> installed version. So, I think that you could create a
On 09/21/2017 06:47 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> After had a look in the spec/spec_helper.rb file I realized that it
> tries to use require with a relative path, and this will not work in a
> installed version. So, I think that you could create a patch to fix it,
> could you do it please?
>
> Chee
Hi Sophie,
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 10:10 +0200, Sophie Brun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following package is ready to be uploaded.
>
> Could you check and sponsor it?
> ruby-gitlab 4.2.0
>
I tried to run autopkgtest against your package and I got the following
error:
/usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems
Hi,
The following package is ready to be uploaded.
Could you check and sponsor it?
ruby-gitlab 4.2.0
Thanks
Regards,
Sophie
19 matches
Mail list logo
