Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2019-09-23 Thread Manas Kashyap
I have fixed all the lintian errors, can you please review it. On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:12 PM Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hey, > > On 22/09/19 10:12 pm, Manas Kashyap wrote: > > Sorry for that initially , i kept it in experimental, as its a > > dependency of gitlab and it might break gitlab , so i

Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2019-09-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Sun, 22 Sep, 2019 at 22:12, Manas Kashyap wrote: Sorry for that initially , i kept it in experimental, as its a dependency of gitlab and it might break gitlab , so i kept it in experimental . Hi Manas, You need to stop guessing and think about things. Why do you think it will break g

Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2019-09-22 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, On 22/09/19 10:12 pm, Manas Kashyap wrote: > Sorry for that initially , i kept it in experimental, as its a > dependency of gitlab and it might break gitlab , so i kept it in > experimental . Please fix that. While at it, please fix the homepage URL in d/control, too. Lintian logs: https://p

Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2019-09-22 Thread Manas Kashyap
Sorry for that initially , i kept it in experimental, as its a dependency of gitlab and it might break gitlab , so i kept it in experimental .

Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2019-09-22 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, On 22/09/19 8:12 pm, Manas Kashyap wrote: > Hola everyone, > > I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem default-value-for. The > package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also > lintian-clean. I've > pushed the package to the personal forked salsa repo > https:/

RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2019-09-22 Thread Manas Kashyap
Hola everyone,I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem default-value-for. The package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've pushed the package to the personal forked salsa repo https://salsa.debian.org/Manas-kashyap-guest/ruby-default-value-for Th

Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2014-11-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tuesday 11 November 2014 07:42 PM, Balasankar C wrote: >> Can you also add more lines to extended description. I usually mention >> the location of README.md when I can't write more description. > I have updated the alioth repo after mentioning the location of README.md. But > when I tried insta

Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2014-11-11 Thread Balasankar C
Hi, > Balu, > > Can you also add more lines to extended description. I usually mention > the location of README.md when I can't write more description. I have updated the alioth repo after mentioning the location of README.md. But when I tried installing the deb file generated, I found out that th

Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2014-11-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Friday 07 November 2014 07:46 PM, Balasankar C wrote: > Updated the git repo for this package with modifications suggested by Cédric > Boutillier on another package (ruby-version-sorter). The changes are > * Starting short description with lowercase letter > * Changing Testsuite to autopkgtest-

Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2014-11-07 Thread Balasankar C
Updated the git repo for this package with modifications suggested by Cédric Boutillier on another package (ruby-version-sorter). The changes are * Starting short description with lowercase letter * Changing Testsuite to autopkgtest-pkg-ruby -- Regards, Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in "Freedo

RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2014-11-01 Thread Balasankar C
Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-default-value-for. It is lintian clean and tested with pbuilder. I've pushed the package to alioth repo /git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-default-value-for.git Consider to review it and upload it. -- Regards, Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in "Freedom is never