Re: RFS: ruby-commandline [ again :( ]

2011-10-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/10/11 at 01:45 +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi again, > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 09:45:06AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 15/10/11 at 23:16 +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I prepared the transition of libcommandline-ruby to the new policy. I > > > kept the

RFS: ruby-commandline [ again :( ]

2011-10-16 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi again, On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 09:45:06AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 15/10/11 at 23:16 +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I prepared the transition of libcommandline-ruby to the new policy. I > > kept the previous package layout, with the documentation generated with > > rd

Re: RFS: ruby-commandline

2011-10-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/10/11 at 23:16 +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi, > > I prepared the transition of libcommandline-ruby to the new policy. I > kept the previous package layout, with the documentation generated with > rdoc shipped as a separate package. > The package is lintian-clean (warnings about duplic

RFS: ruby-commandline

2011-10-15 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi, I prepared the transition of libcommandline-ruby to the new policy. I kept the previous package layout, with the documentation generated with rdoc shipped as a separate package. The package is lintian-clean (warnings about duplicate description overriden) and builds fine in a clean chroot. The