Re: RFS: ruby-bundle

2011-04-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/04/11 at 23:37 +0530, Hemanth H.M wrote: > So first repec must be packed and uploaded then this? rspec, yes. L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/

Re: RFS: ruby-bundle

2011-04-22 Thread Hemanth H.M
So first repec must be packed and uploaded then this? On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 22/04/11 at 23:03 +0530, Hemanth H.M wrote: >> Hello hackers, >> Facing issue packing, have attached the pbuilder log. Please have a look and >> let me know, i added rubygems to deps

Re: RFS: ruby-bundle

2011-04-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/04/11 at 23:03 +0530, Hemanth H.M wrote: > Hello hackers, > Facing issue packing, have attached the pbuilder log. Please have a look and > let me know, i added rubygems to deps list in the control file, but also. > rspec-rails (2.5.0) is not there in debian yet, is that the issue? Thank > yo

Re: RFS: ruby-bundle

2011-04-22 Thread Hemanth H.M
Hello hackers, Facing issue packing, have attached the pbuilder log. Please have a look and let me know, i added rubygems to deps list in the control file, but also. rspec-rails (2.5.0) is not there in debian yet, is that the issue? Thank you in advance. On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Lucas N

Re: RFS: ruby-bundle

2011-04-18 Thread Hemanth H.M
Okies, will be redone accordingly, thanks for the help Lucas. On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 19/04/11 at 10:12 +0530, Hemanth H.M wrote: > > /me had got the results as attached, true the package name must be > > bundle*r*, rather than bundle. We remove the current pa

Re: RFS: ruby-bundle

2011-04-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 19/04/11 at 10:12 +0530, Hemanth H.M wrote: > /me had got the results as attached, true the package name must be > bundle*r*, rather than bundle. We remove the current package and redo it, > thank you. > > Reconfirming steps : > Just gem2deb? > Or > gem fetch bundler, then gem2tgz, dh-make-ruby

Re: RFS: ruby-bundle

2011-04-18 Thread Hemanth H.M
/me had got the results as attached, true the package name must be bundle*r*, rather than bundle. We remove the current package and redo it, thank you. Reconfirming steps : Just gem2deb? Or gem fetch bundler, then gem2tgz, dh-make-ruby foo-1.2.tar.gz, edited the copyrights and controls file and us

Re: RFS: ruby-bundle

2011-04-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 18/04/11 at 22:35 +0530, Hemanth H.M wrote: > Shall i remove it and re-dput ? Just gem2deb or gem fetch bundler, then > gem2tgz, dh-make-ruby foo-1.2.tar.gz, edited the copyrights and controls > file and used pbuilder to create the deb, sign the required files and then a > dput? I get this: ***

Re: RFS: ruby-bundle

2011-04-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 18/04/11 at 12:18 +0530, Hemanth H.M wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-bundle". > > * Package name: ruby-bundle > Version : 0.0.1-1 > Upstream Author : Andre Arko > * URL : http://gembundler.com/ > * License : MIT Lic

RFS: ruby-bundle

2011-04-17 Thread Hemanth H.M
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-bundle". * Package name: ruby-bundle Version : 0.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Andre Arko * URL : http://gembundler.com/ * License : MIT License Section : ruby It builds these binary packages: r