Re: RFS: ruby-base62

2014-10-13 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi Jonas, Uploaded, thanks! Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: ruby-base62

2014-10-13 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello, for the obsolete rubygems data, here is an upload: ruby-base62 (1.0.0-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * d/control: - added Testsuite header - switched homepage to https - bumped up standards version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) Could any dd please have a

Re: RFS: ruby-base62 0.1.4-1

2013-09-10 Thread Thomas Bechtold
Hi Cédric, On 09/10/2013 05:02 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Here are a few comments: > > * debian/changelog: replace UNRELEASED by unstable Done. > * debian/control: > - uncomment the Vcs-* fields > - the "short" description is too long. At the moment, it is a mere > copy of the long

Re: RFS: ruby-base62 0.1.4-1

2013-09-10 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Dear Thomas, On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:07:42AM +0200, Thomas Bechtold wrote: > Hi, > The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the > points listed on > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship, but > it's my first ruby package and I'm a ruby newbie

RFS: ruby-base62 0.1.4-1

2013-09-10 Thread Thomas Bechtold
Hi, The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship, but it's my first ruby package and I'm a ruby newbie so I'm not sure if I handled the rubygem patching correct). Could you please review and