On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 12:51:02AM +0200, Tomasz Nitecki wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 06/09/17 15:11, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> > I uploaded it. I just added the Testsuite field in debian/control to
> > mark it as autopkgtest-able.
>
> Thanks! :)
>
> Just one question - if a gem/package doesn't contain a
Hey,
On 06/09/17 15:11, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> I uploaded it. I just added the Testsuite field in debian/control to
> mark it as autopkgtest-able.
Thanks! :)
Just one question - if a gem/package doesn't contain any tests, should
we always add 'Testsuite' field?
Regards,
T.
signature.asc
D
Hi,
I uploaded it. I just added the Testsuite field in debian/control to
mark it as autopkgtest-able.
Thanks for your work!
Cheers.
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 02:56 +0200, Tomasz Nitecki wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 05/09/17 18:27, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> > I took a look on this package after your RFS and
Hey,
On 05/09/17 18:27, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> I took a look on this package after your RFS and most of the
> modifications seems ok, but I do not know why did you update the years
> of upstream copyright if they did not do it. Could you clarify it to
> me? Has some especific reason?
My mistake
Hi Tomasz,
On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 01:15 +0200, Tomasz Nitecki wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've updated ruby-aws-sdk (new upstream, some minor changes). I'd
> appreciate if someone could take a look and upload it. Thanks :)
>
I took a look on this package after your RFS and most of the
modifications seems
Hey,
I've updated ruby-aws-sdk (new upstream, some minor changes). I'd
appreciate if someone could take a look and upload it. Thanks :)
Regards,
T.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
6 matches
Mail list logo
